Usage Score
16.6
Player Dossier
2013-2017Colorado
Bryce Bobo
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Covina, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Bryce Bobo reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.3
Consistency
42.3
Season Value
50.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Colorado
131415161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryce Bobo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Colorado. Bryce Bobo reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Colorado paired 693 primary output with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Colorado
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.7
Efficiency
68.3
Usage
16.6
Consistency
42.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 25. Colorado State: 99. Unknown: 7. Michigan: 50. Oregon: 72. Oregon State: 20. USC: 83. Arizona State: 110. Stanford: 27. UCLA: 7. Arizona: 19. Washington State: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 3 by 55.6. Colorado State: 5 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 23.3. Michigan: 1 by 100. Oregon: 5 by 96. Oregon State: 4 by 33.3. USC: 10 by 55.3. Arizona State: 6 by 100. Stanford: 2 by 90. UCLA: 2 by 23.3. Arizona: 3 by 42.2. Washington State: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins47.9 · Games = 8 · -4.8 vs Losses
Losses52.7 · Games = 3 · +4.8 vs Wins
First Half45.5 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half45.8 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Oklahoma State | L 8-38 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Washington State | W 38-24 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Arizona | W 49-24 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 11/4 | vs UCLA | W 20-10 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Stanford | W 10-5 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards | W 40-16 | — | 6 | 110 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 66 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ USCHigh volume | L 17-21 | — | 10 | 83 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Oregon State | W 47-6 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Oregon | W 41-38 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Michigan | L 28-45 | — | 1 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Colorado State | W 44-7 | — | 5 | 99 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado | 215 | 54.1 | 9.1 | 215 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 207 | 63 | 12.8 | -8 |
| 2016 Postseason | Colorado | 548 | 68.3 | 16.6 | 341 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 548 | 68.3 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Colorado | 693 | 76.6 | 25.8 | 145 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona State
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCLA
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#5
USC
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 75.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Colorado
693 primary output · 76.6 efficiency · 25.8 usage
65.5
#2
2016 Postseason · Colorado
50.8
548 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 16.6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Colorado
50.8
548 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8531
Charter Oak · Covina, CA
- Committed To
- Colorado
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,663
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.