Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2013-2016Washington State
River Cracraft
WR • 6'0" • Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
River Cracraft reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.8
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
64
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Washington State
131314151516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
River Cracraft, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Washington State. River Cracraft reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Washington State paired 771 primary output with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Washington State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
70.1
Efficiency
77.8
Usage
14.7
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 41. Boise State: 31. Idaho: 42. Oregon: 73. Stanford: 130. UCLA: 74. Arizona State: 79. Oregon State: 54. Arizona: 90. California: 87
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 54.7. Boise State: 5 by 41.3. Idaho: 4 by 70. Oregon: 4 by 100. Stanford: 7 by 100. UCLA: 6 by 82.2. Arizona State: 7 by 75.2. Oregon State: 4 by 90. Arizona: 2 by 100. California: 9 by 64.4
Split Comparison
Wins78.6 · n=8
First Half63.4 · n=5 · -13.4 vs Second Half
Second Half76.8 · n=5 · +13.4 vs First Half
All Games70.1 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/13 | vs CaliforniaHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 56-21 | — | 9 | 87 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 3 | 22 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Arizona | W 69-7 | — | 2 | 90 | 45 | 45 | 1 | 71 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Oregon State | W 35-31 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Arizona State | W 37-32 | — | 7 | 79 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs UCLA | W 27-21 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards | W 42-16 | — | 7 | 130 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Oregon | W 51-33 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Idaho | W 56-6 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 9/11 | @ Boise State | L 28-31 | — | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320132014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Washington State | 614 | 82.1 | 10.5 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Washington State | 614 | 82.1 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington State | 771 | 77.8 | 17.5 | 157 |
| 2015 Postseason | Washington State | 615 | 75.6 | 13.3 | -156 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Washington State | 615 | 75.6 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington State | 701 | 77.8 | 14.7 | 86 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
California
172
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
125
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 92.6 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Washington State
771 primary output · 77.8 efficiency · 17.5 usage
66.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Washington State
64
701 primary · 77.8 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Washington State
58.9
614 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 10.5 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8115
North Crowley · Fort Worth, TX
- Committed To
- New Mexico
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,701
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.