Usage / Role
81%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2016California
QB • 6'5" • Prosper, TX, USA
Davis Webb is a balanced quarterback profile with 8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
81%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a quarterback
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
81
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · California
Snapshot
Player Story
Davis Webb built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a quarterback from Prosper, TX wearing No. 7, spending time with California and Texas Tech. The clearest part of Davis Webb's career was his passing role:...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Davis Webb, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · California. Davis Webb is a balanced quarterback profile with 8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint

Featured Highlight
Davis Webb Texas Tech Highlights
2015 · Texas Tech · Player Highlight
Davis Webb college highlights at Texas Tech.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Texas Tech | 10 | 406 | 403 | 3 | 4 | 53.7 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 10 | 2,300 | 2,315 | -15 | 16 | 53.7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 8 | 2,555 | 2,539 | 16 | 25 | 57.1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 5 | 306 | 300 | 6 | 4 | 38.3 |
| 2016 Regular Season | California | 12 | 4,185 | 4,295 | -110 | 43 | 64.2 |
Related Context
Davis Webb played QB for Texas Tech and California. Across 4 tracked seasons, Davis Webb recorded 9,852 passing yards, -100 rushing yards, and -10 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with California.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
California paired 4,185 primary output with 53.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 61.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, California.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Win with 478 yards of offense and 75.6 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
270.6
Efficiency
61.1
Usage
10.2
Consistency
66.4
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 406. Stephen F. Austin: 121. TCU: 77. Texas State: 324. Kansas: 36. Iowa State: 411. West Virginia: 478. Oklahoma: 355. Oklahoma State: 429. Kansas State: 69
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 44 by 65.1. Stephen F. Austin: 18 by 45. TCU: 4 by 91.7. Texas State: 46 by 58.1. Kansas: 6 by 66.7. Iowa State: 61 by 54.3. West Virginia: 53 by 75.6. Oklahoma: 58 by 51.9. Oklahoma State: 75 by 53. Kansas State: 21 by 49.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs TCU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | vs Arizona State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 37-23 | 28 | 41 | 403 | 68.3 | 4 | 0 | 65.1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Kansas State | L 26-49 | 13 | 20 | 78 | 65.0 | 1 | 0 | 49.4 | 1 | -9 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Oklahoma State300-yard game | L 34-52 | 45 | 71 | 425 | 63.4 | 2 | 2 | 53 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Oklahoma300-yard game | L 30-38 | 33 | 53 | 385 | 62.3 | 2 | 2 | 51.9 | 5 | -30 | -6 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ West Virginia300-yard game | W 37-27 | 36 | 50 | 462 | 72.0 | 2 | 0 | 75.6 | 3 | 16 | 5.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Iowa State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 42-35 | 35 | 56 | 415 | 62.5 | 3 | 1 | 54.3 | 5 | -4 | -0.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Kansas | W 54-16 | 3 | 6 | 36 | 50.0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Texas State300-yard game | W 33-7 | 19 | 43 | 310 | 44.2 | 2 | 2 | 58.1 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 9/12 | vs TCU | W 20-10 | 3 | 4 | 77 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 91.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Stephen F. Austin | W 61-13 | 11 | 17 | 127 | 64.7 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 1 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
Player Story
Davis Webb built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a quarterback from Prosper, TX wearing No. 7, spending time with California and Texas Tech. The clearest part of Davis Webb's career was his passing role: 9,852 passing yards, 83 touchdown passes, and 1,367 attempts across 35 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with California. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 35 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across California and Texas Tech.
The arc is straightforward: Davis Webb moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas Tech
2013-2015
Opening stop
California
2016
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Texas Tech | 2,706 | 61.1 | 10.2 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 2,706 | 61.1 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 2,555 | 58.6 | 8.6 | -151 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 306 | 66.1 | 6.7 | -2,249 |
| 2016 Regular Season | California | 4,185 | 53.9 | 8 | 3,879 |
#1 Featured game
@ Baylor
Week 5 · L 35-63 · Conference game
Loss with 115 yards of offense and 72.4 efficiency.
115
Total Offense
86.2 takeover
115 total offense with 72.4 efficiency.
#2
vs Iowa State
Week 6 · W 66-31 · Conference game
69
Total Offense
69.1 takeover
Win with 69 yards of offense and 78.1 efficiency.
69 total offense with 78.1 efficiency.
#3
@ West Virginia
Week 8 · W 37-27 · Conference game
478
Total Offense
65.9 takeover
Win with 478 yards of offense and 75.6 efficiency.
478 total offense with 75.6 efficiency.
#4
@ San Diego State
Week 2 · L 40-45
503
Total Offense
60.1 takeover
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
503 total offense with 50.2 efficiency.
#5
vs Oklahoma State
Week 10 · L 34-52 · Conference game
429
Total Offense
59 takeover
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
429 total offense with 53 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · California
4,185 primary output · 53.9 efficiency · 8 usage
64.2
#2
2014 Regular Season · Texas Tech
57.1
2,555 primary · 58.6 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Texas Tech
53.7
2,706 primary · 61.1 efficiency · 10.2 usage
24
250+ passing yards
17
300+ total offense
16
3+ TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.