Usage Score
28
Player Dossier
2014-2016Akron
WR • 6'3" • Akron, OH, USA
Jerome Lane reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28
Efficiency
88
Consistency
55.6
Season Value
67.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerome Lane, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Akron. Jerome Lane reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Akron paired 782 primary output with 92.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
84.8
Efficiency
88
Usage
28
Consistency
55.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 196. Wisconsin: 43. Marshall: 115. App State: 134. Kent State: 15. Miami (OH): 14. Western Michigan: 42. Ball State: 90. Buffalo: 40. Toledo: 177. Bowling Green: 97. Ohio: 55
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 10 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 95.6. Marshall: 7 by 100. App State: 9 by 99.3. Kent State: 1 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 46.7. Western Michigan: 4 by 70. Ball State: 7 by 85.7. Buffalo: 4 by 66.7. Toledo: 6 by 100. Bowling Green: 5 by 100. Ohio: 4 by 91.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/23 | @ Ohio | L 3-9 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Thu 11/10 | vs Bowling Green | L 28-38 | — | 5 | 97 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 1 | 64 |
| Wed 11/2 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards | L 17-48 | — | 6 | 177 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 91 |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Buffalo | L 20-41 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Ball State | W 35-25 | — | 7 | 90 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Western Michigan | L 0-41 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Miami (OH) | W 35-13 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Kent State | W 31-27 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs App State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 38-45 | — | 9 | 134 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards | W 65-38 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-54 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 10 | 196 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 2 | 42 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Akron | 782 | 92.9 | 24.5 | 782 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Akron | 782 | 92.9 | 24.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Akron | 1,018 | 88 | 28 | 236 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
196
Primary metric
196 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
177
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
99
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Akron
782 primary output · 92.9 efficiency · 24.5 usage
68.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Akron
68.1
782 primary · 92.9 efficiency · 24.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Akron
67.7
1,018 primary · 88 efficiency · 28 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8333
Firestone · Akron, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,800
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jerome Lane quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit