Usage Score
14.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Colorado
OLB • 6'5" • College Station, TX, USA
Jimmie Gilbert shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
14.1
Efficiency
38.5
Consistency
61.3
Season Value
40.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Colorado
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jimmie Gilbert, OLB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Colorado. Jimmie Gilbert shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.5 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Colorado paired 28 primary output with 38.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 38.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2
Efficiency
38.5
Usage
14.1
Consistency
61.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 2. Colorado State: 2. Unknown: 2. Michigan: 1. Oregon: 2. Oregon State: 4. USC: 1. Arizona State: 5. Stanford: 1. UCLA: 0. Arizona: 4. Washington State: 0. Utah: 1. Washington: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 5 by 40.8. Colorado State: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 2 by 28.3. Michigan: 2 by 18.3. Oregon: 5 by 40.8. Oregon State: 7 by 69.2. USC: 4 by 26.7. Arizona State: 6 by 75. Stanford: 5 by 30.8. UCLA: 1 by 4.2. Arizona: 6 by 65. Washington State: 4 by 16.7. Utah: 7 by 39.2. Washington: 4 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
75 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Oklahoma State | L 8-38 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Washington | L 10-41 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Utah | W 27-22 | 7 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Washington State | W 38-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Arizona2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-24 | 6 | 5 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/4 | vs UCLA | W 20-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Stanford | W 10-5 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Arizona State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 40-16 | 6 | 6 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ USC | L 17-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Oregon State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 47-6 | 7 | 7 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Oregon | W 41-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Michigan | L 28-45 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Colorado State | W 44-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Colorado
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Colorado | 28 | 38.5 | 14.1 | 28 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 28 | 38.5 | 14.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.6 takeover score.
#2
Oregon State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.9 takeover score.
#3
Arizona
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#4
Washington
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 40.5 takeover score.
#5
Oklahoma State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 34.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Colorado
28 primary output · 38.5 efficiency · 14.1 usage
40.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Colorado
40.5
28 primary · 38.5 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Colorado
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.845
A&M Consolidated · College Station, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
62
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jimmie Gilbert quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit