Usage Score
17.6
Player Dossier
2013-2016Purdue
DeAngelo Yancey
WR • 6'2" • Atlanta, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
DeAngelo Yancey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.8
Consistency
73.9
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeAngelo Yancey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. DeAngelo Yancey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 951 primary output with 89.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
63.6
Efficiency
79.8
Usage
17.6
Consistency
73.9
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 78. Unknown: 68. Virginia Tech: 24. Bowling Green: 80. Michigan State: 68. Wisconsin: 3. Nebraska: 111. Illinois: 51. Northwestern: 39. Iowa: 117. Indiana: 61
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 5 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Virginia Tech: 2 by 80. Bowling Green: 4 by 100. Michigan State: 4 by 100. Wisconsin: 1 by 20. Nebraska: 5 by 100. Illinois: 5 by 68. Northwestern: 4 by 65. Iowa: 9 by 86.7. Indiana: 7 by 58.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses57.9 · Games = 9
First Half53.5 · Games = 6 · -22.3 vs Second Half
Second Half75.8 · Games = 5 · +22.3 vs First Half
All Games63.6 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Indiana | L 36-54 | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-40 | — | 9 | 117 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Northwestern | L 14-21 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Illinois | L 14-48 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Nebraska100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 55-45 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 2 | 83 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Wisconsin | L 7-24 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Michigan State | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Bowling Green | L 28-35 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Virginia Tech | L 24-51 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 68 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 50 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Marshall | L 31-41 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 50 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 546 | 80.7 | 18.3 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 147 | 70 | 9 | -399 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 700 | 79.8 | 17.6 | 553 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 951 | 89.9 | 17.3 | 251 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
155
Primary metric
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
146
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Nebraska
111
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
951 primary output · 89.9 efficiency · 17.3 usage
69.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
61
700 primary · 79.8 efficiency · 17.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Purdue
52
546 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 18.3 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8325
Mays · Atlanta, GA
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,344
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.