Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016Purdue
Evan Panfil
DE • 6'4" • New Lenox, IL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Evan Panfil shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.7
Consistency
22.9
Season Value
28.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Evan Panfil, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. Evan Panfil shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 17 primary output with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
26.7
Usage
11.9
Consistency
22.9
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0.5. Cincinnati: 0. Nevada: 6. Illinois: 0. Iowa: 4. Nebraska: 3. Penn State: 2. Minnesota: 0.5. Northwestern: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Indiana: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 17.5. Cincinnati: 2 by 8.3. Nevada: 5 by 70.8. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 3 by 52.5. Nebraska: 4 by 46.7. Penn State: 1 by 24.2. Minnesota: 4 by 21.7. Northwestern: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 3 by 12.5. Indiana: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins3 · Games = 2 · +1.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 8 · -1.7 vs Wins
First Half2.3 · Games = 6 · +1.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · Games = 5 · -1.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Nevada
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | L 24-26 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Wisconsin | L 20-49 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Northwestern | L 17-45 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Minnesota | L 31-44 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Penn State | L 24-62 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ NebraskaSplash game | L 14-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Iowa2+ sacks · Splash game | L 35-49 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Illinois | W 34-31 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nevada2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-14 | 5 | 5 | — | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Cincinnati | L 20-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 17 | 26.7 | 11.9 | 17 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 64.6 takeover score.
#2
Iowa
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
#3
Nebraska
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 37.8 takeover score.
#4
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 25.1 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
0.5
Primary metric
Game with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 17.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
17 primary output · 26.7 efficiency · 11.9 usage
28.2
#2
2013 Regular Season · Purdue
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Purdue
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8242
Lincoln-Way Central · New Lenox, IL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
32
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.