Usage Score
19
Player Dossier
2013-2017Rice
Brian Womac
DE • 6'2" • 250 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
High-volume tacklerDown-to-down presence
Brian Womac shows a high-volume tackler profile with 42.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
42.1
Consistency
43
Season Value
40.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Womac, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice. Brian Womac shows a high-volume tackler profile with 42.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rice paired 31 primary output with 42.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 42.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Rice
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.6
Efficiency
42.1
Usage
19
Consistency
43
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 2. UTEP: 1. Houston: 2. Florida International: 6. Pittsburgh: 2. Army: 0. UTSA: 7. Louisiana Tech: 1. UAB: 1. Southern Miss: 1.5. Old Dominion: 2.5. North Texas: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 3 by 32.5. UTEP: 3 by 22.5. Houston: 5 by 40.8. Florida International: 7 by 79.2. Pittsburgh: 1 by 24.2. Army: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 9 by 87.5. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 18.3. UAB: 2 by 18.3. Southern Miss: 10 by 56.7. Old Dominion: 5 by 45.8. North Texas: 6 by 75
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses2.7 · Games = 11
First Half2.2 · Games = 6 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half3 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs First Half
All Games2.6 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs North Texas2+ sacks · Splash game | L 14-30 | 6 | 6 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Old DominionSplash game | L 21-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Southern Miss10+ tackles | L 34-43 | 10 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ UAB | L 21-52 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 28-42 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ UTSA2+ sacks · Splash game | L 7-20 | 9 | 7 | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Army | L 12-49 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Pittsburgh | L 10-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Florida International2+ sacks · Splash game | L 7-13 | 7 | 7 | — | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ Houston | L 3-38 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/27 | vs Stanford | L 7-62 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 8.5 | 15.7 | 8.2 | 8.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 31 | 42.1 | 19 | 22.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 75.6 takeover score.
#2
Florida International
6
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 63.4 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
5
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 56.8 takeover score.
#4
Army
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#5
UTEP
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rice
31 primary output · 42.1 efficiency · 19 usage
40.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Rice
13.6
8.5 primary · 15.7 efficiency · 8.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
5
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7978
Memorial · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
75
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.