Usage / Role
18%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2017Rice
S • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Cole Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Usage / Role
18%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
25
Developing production for a safety
Reliability
30
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
36
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Player Story
Cole Thomas built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a safety from Katy, TX wearing No. 28, spending time with Rice. The clearest part of Cole Thomas' career was his defensive production: 36 tackles, 1...
Read the storyCole Thomas, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Rice. Cole Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 9 | 23 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 19.3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 5 | 13 | 1 | 0 | - | 3 | 0 | 60.1 |
Related Context
Cole Thomas played S for Rice. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cole Thomas recorded 36 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Rice.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rice paired 5 primary output with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 12.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
12.9
Usage
2
Consistency
7.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTSA: 1. Prairie View A&M: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Charlotte: 0. UTEP: 1. Stanford: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 2 by 8.3. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 3 by 22.5. Prairie View A&M: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 25. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 20.8. Charlotte: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 1 by 14.2. Stanford: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
25 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Stanford | L 17-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTEP | W 44-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Charlotte | W 22-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 25-42 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 16-61 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Prairie View A&M | W 65-44 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UTSA | L 13-14 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Southern Miss | L 28-44 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army | L 14-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Cole Thomas built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a safety from Katy, TX wearing No. 28, spending time with Rice. The clearest part of Cole Thomas' career was his defensive production: 36 tackles, 1 tackle for loss, 1 interception, and 5 passes defended across 14 career games in the available record. That gives Cole Thomas' career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 2 | 12.9 | 2 | 2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 5 | 20.8 | 5.7 | 3 |
#1 Featured game
vs Army
Week 6 · L 12-49
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Havoc Plays
58.9 takeover
1 disruption/tackle impact with 58.9 takeover score.
#2
vs Stanford
Week 1 · L 7-62
2
Havoc Plays
47.2 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#3
vs UTSA
Week 7 · L 13-14 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
46.7 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#4
vs UTEP
Week 12 · W 44-24 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
40.6 takeover
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.6 takeover score.
#5
@ Houston
Week 3 · L 3-38
1
Havoc Plays
38.6 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Rice
5 primary output · 20.8 efficiency · 5.7 usage
60.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Rice
19.3
2 primary · 12.9 efficiency · 2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.