Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2013-2017TCU
Cole Hunt
TE • 6'7" • 255 lbs • El Campo, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Cole Hunt reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
14
Developing production for a tight end
lowelite
Reliability
7
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
23
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · TCU
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Unique Seasons
- 5
- Program Path
- Rice • TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
3★
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Cole Hunt, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · TCU. Cole Hunt reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 242
- Receptions
- 25
- Touchdowns
- 2
Quick Answers
Cole Hunt quick answers
- Latest team and position
- TCU · TE
- Career Receiving Yards
- 242
- Tracked sample
- 5 unique seasons · 5 entries · 22 games
- Best season
- 2016 Regular Season · TCU
- Top game
- Texas
- Recruit profile
- 3-star · El Campo · Rice
- High school pipeline
- El Campo · 6 FBS recruits · 1 drafted player
- Latest roster
- No. 81 · Class 2017
- 2017 Receiving yards rank
- 63 receiving yards · TE 177th (top 53%) · Big 12 93rd (top 59%) · National 1,145th (top 59%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 3 | 4 | 47 | 0 | 51.7 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 6 | 9 | 71 | 1 | 57 |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 5 | 5 | 61 | 1 | 60 |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 8 | 7 | 63 | 0 | 52.2 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Cole Hunt
Cole Hunt played TE for Rice and TCU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cole Hunt recorded 242 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Rice.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
TCU paired 61 primary output with 70.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rice, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Rice
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
15.7
Efficiency
72.2
Usage
6.9
Consistency
45.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 29. Army: 10. UTSA: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 96.7. Army: 1 by 66.7. UTSA: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins9 · Games = 2 · -20 vs Losses
Losses29 · Games = 1 · +20 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
96.7 vs Texas A&M
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2013-2015
Opening stop
- 2
TCU
2016-2017
Final stop
Season Value Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 47 | 72.2 | 6.9 | 47 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 71 | 49.3 | 7.4 | 24 |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 61 | 70.8 | 6.5 | -10 |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 63 | 53.3 | 4.7 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
@ Texas
Week 2 · L 28-42
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34
Receiving Yards
76.3 takeover
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Texas A&M
Week 3 · L 10-38
29
Receiving Yards
74.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
vs Texas
Week 10 · W 24-7 · Conference game
22
Receiving Yards
72.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Oklahoma State
Week 12 · L 6-31 · Conference game
23
Receiving Yards
72.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Texas
Week 13 · W 31-9 · Conference game
19
Receiving Yards
62.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · TCU
61 primary output · 70.8 efficiency · 6.5 usage
60
#2
2015 Regular Season · Rice
57
71 primary · 49.3 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · TCU
52.2
63 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 4.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cole Hunt
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.