Usage Score
18.4
Player Dossier
2014-2017Akron
WR • 5'8" • 180 lbs • Orlando, FL, USA
A.J. Coney reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.4
Efficiency
84.2
Consistency
62.8
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Coney, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Akron. A.J. Coney reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Akron paired 551 primary output with 84.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
39.4
Efficiency
84.2
Usage
18.4
Consistency
62.8
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 28. Penn State: 25. Unknown: 39. Iowa State: 52. Troy: 35. Bowling Green: 42. Ball State: 90. Western Michigan: 38. Toledo: 24. Buffalo: 91. Miami (OH): 36. Ohio: 16. Kent State: 12. Toledo: 23
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 93.3. Penn State: 2 by 83.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. Iowa State: 4 by 86.7. Troy: 3 by 77.8. Bowling Green: 5 by 56. Ball State: 6 by 100. Western Michigan: 3 by 84.4. Toledo: 3 by 53.3. Buffalo: 7 by 86.7. Miami (OH): 2 by 100. Ohio: 1 by 100. Kent State: 1 by 80. Toledo: 2 by 76.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 3-50 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Toledo | L 28-45 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/22 | vs Kent State | W 24-14 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 11/15 | vs Ohio | W 37-34 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| Wed 11/8 | @ Miami (OH) | L 14-24 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Buffalo | W 21-20 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Toledo | L 21-48 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Western Michigan | W 14-13 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Ball State | W 31-3 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Bowling Green | W 34-23 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Troy | L 17-22 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Iowa State | L 14-41 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Penn State | L 0-52 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Akron | 125 | 58.7 | 11.3 | 125 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Akron | 125 | 58.7 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Akron | 173 | 77 | 10.9 | 48 |
| 2017 Postseason | Akron | 551 | 84.2 | 18.4 | 378 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Akron | 551 | 84.2 | 18.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Utah State
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
App State
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Akron
551 primary output · 84.2 efficiency · 18.4 usage
66.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Akron
66.3
551 primary · 84.2 efficiency · 18.4 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Akron
47.8
173 primary · 77 efficiency · 10.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
849
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
A.J. Coney quick answers