Usage Score
34.2
Player Dossier
2013-2015Colorado State
Rashard Higgins
WR • 6'2" • Dallas, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Rashard Higgins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.7
Consistency
78.3
Season Value
66.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Colorado State
131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Colorado State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rashard Higgins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Colorado State. Rashard Higgins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Colorado State paired 1,750 primary output with 96.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Colorado State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
88.5
Efficiency
90.7
Usage
34.2
Consistency
78.3
Best Game by takeover score
Nevada
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 129. Unknown: 84. Colorado: 125. UTSA: 103. Utah State: 115. Boise State: 42. Air Force: 74. San Diego State: 75. Wyoming: 49. UNLV: 102. New Mexico: 140. Fresno State: 24
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 9 by 95.6. Unknown: 7 by 80. Colorado: 8 by 100. UTSA: 5 by 100. Utah State: 11 by 69.7. Boise State: 3 by 93.3. Air Force: 7 by 70.5. San Diego State: 5 by 100. Wyoming: 4 by 81.7. UNLV: 7 by 97.1. New Mexico: 8 by 100. Fresno State: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins82 · n=6 · -15.2 vs Losses
Losses97.2 · n=5 · +15.2 vs Wins
First Half99.7 · n=6 · +22.3 vs Second Half
Second Half77.3 · n=6 · -22.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/30 | vs Nevada100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-28 | — | 9 | 129 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Fresno State | W 34-31 | — | 1 | 24 | 22 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-21 | — | 8 | 140 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs UNLV100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 49-35 | — | 7 | 102 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 3 | 46 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Wyoming | W 26-7 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs San Diego State | L 17-41 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Air Force | W 38-23 | — | 7 | 74 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Boise State | L 10-41 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Utah State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 18-33 | — | 11 | 115 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ UTSA100 receiving yards | W 33-31 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Colorado100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-27 | — | 8 | 125 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado State
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Colorado State | 837 | 67.4 | 22.7 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Colorado State | 837 | 67.4 | 22.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Colorado State | 1,750 | 96.6 | 34.7 | 913 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado State | 1,750 | 96.6 | 34.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Colorado State | 1,062 | 90.7 | 34.2 | -688 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado State | 1,062 | 90.7 | 34.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
193
Primary metric
193 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah State
187
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
187 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Nevada
194
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
194 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTEP
156
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Colorado State
1,750 primary output · 96.6 efficiency · 34.7 usage
77.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · Colorado State
77.9
1,750 primary · 96.6 efficiency · 34.7 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Colorado State
66.8
1,062 primary · 90.7 efficiency · 34.2 usage
Milestones
18
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,649
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.