Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2016Boise State
WR • 6'0" • Carmichael, CA, USA
Thomas Sperbeck reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
67
Solid production for a receiver
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
54
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Boise State
Snapshot
Player Story
Thomas Sperbeck built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Carmichael, CA wearing No. 82, spending time with Boise State. The clearest part of Thomas Sperbeck's career was his receiving...
Read the storyThomas Sperbeck, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Boise State. Thomas Sperbeck reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Boise State | 5 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 31.6 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Boise State | 5 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 31.6 |
| 2014 Postseason | Boise State | 10 | 12 | 199 | 0 | 72.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Boise State | 10 | 39 | 678 | 4 | 72.5 |
| 2015 Postseason | Boise State | 13 | 6 | 78 | 0 | 81.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Boise State | 13 | 82 | 1,334 | 9 | 81.2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Boise State | 13 | 8 | 79 | 0 | 87.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Boise State | 13 | 72 | 1,193 | 12 | 87.8 |
Related Context
Thomas Sperbeck played WR for Boise State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Thomas Sperbeck recorded 181 passing yards, 106 rushing yards, and 3,601 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Boise State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Boise State paired 1,272 primary output with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
108.6
Efficiency
84.5
Usage
25
Consistency
56.7
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 78. Washington: 28. BYU: 13. Idaho State: 99. Virginia: 121. Hawai'i: 87. Colorado State: 178. Utah State: 156. Wyoming: 84. UNLV: 163. New Mexico: 281. Air Force: 79. San José State: 45
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 6 by 86.7. Washington: 3 by 62.2. BYU: 2 by 43.3. Idaho State: 7 by 94.3. Virginia: 5 by 100. Hawai'i: 5 by 100. Colorado State: 5 by 100. Utah State: 6 by 100. Wyoming: 6 by 93.3. UNLV: 10 by 100. New Mexico: 20 by 93.7. Air Force: 7 by 75.2. San José State: 6 by 50
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/23 | @ Northern Illinois | W 55-7 | — | 6 | 78 | 11.3 | 13 | 0 | 23 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ San José State | W 40-23 | — | 6 | 45 | 8.3 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Air Force | L 30-37 | — | 7 | 79 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs New Mexico100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-31 | — | 20 | 281 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ UNLV100 receiving yards · High volume | W 55-27 | — | 10 | 163 | 15.8 | 16.30 | 0 | 40 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Wyoming2+ TD | W 34-14 | — | 6 | 84 | 13.3 | 14 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Utah State100 receiving yards | L 26-52 | — | 6 | 156 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Colorado State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-10 | — | 5 | 178 | 35.6 | 35.60 | 2 | 85 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Hawai'i | W 55-0 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Virginia100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-14 | — | 5 | 121 | 24.2 | 24.20 | 2 | 64 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Idaho State | W 52-0 | — | 7 | 99 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 0 | 46 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ BYU | L 24-35 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Washington | W 16-13 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
Player Story
Thomas Sperbeck built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Carmichael, CA wearing No. 82, spending time with Boise State. The clearest part of Thomas Sperbeck's career was his receiving role: 224 catches, 3,601 receiving yards, 20 touchdowns, and 106 rushing yards across 41 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Boise State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 181 passing yards, 106 rushing yards, and 2 tackles, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 41 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Boise State.
The arc is straightforward: Thomas Sperbeck moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Boise State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Boise State | 40 | 52.5 | 4.4 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Boise State | 40 | 52.5 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Boise State | 877 | 94.7 | 23.7 | 837 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Boise State | 877 | 94.7 | 23.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Boise State | 1,412 | 84.5 | 25 | 535 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Boise State | 1,412 | 84.5 | 25 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Boise State | 1,272 | 86.2 | 33.3 | -140 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Boise State | 1,272 | 86.2 | 33.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Arizona
Week 1 · W 38-30 · Postseason
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
199
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
199 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ New Mexico
Week 6 · W 49-21 · Conference game
198
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
198 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs New Mexico
Week 11 · L 24-31 · Conference game
281
Receiving Yards
97.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
281 receiving yards with a 93.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ New Mexico
Week 11 · W 60-49 · Conference game
164
Receiving Yards
94.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Washington State
Week 2 · W 31-28
133
Receiving Yards
89.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Boise State
1,272 primary output · 86.2 efficiency · 33.3 usage
87.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Boise State
87.8
1,272 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 33.3 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Boise State
81.2
1,412 primary · 84.5 efficiency · 25 usage
15
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.