Usage Score
13.2
Player Dossier
2013-2015New Mexico State
Jordan Bergstrom
WR • 5'11" • Portland, OR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jordan Bergstrom reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
62
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · New Mexico State
131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- New Mexico State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Bergstrom, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · New Mexico State. Jordan Bergstrom reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 437 primary output with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · New Mexico State
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
48.6
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
13.2
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia State: 77. UTEP: 26. New Mexico: 3. Ole Miss: 16. Georgia Southern: 46. Idaho: 42. Texas State: 21. Arkansas State: 110. UL Monroe: 96
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia State: 6 by 85.6. UTEP: 2 by 86.7. New Mexico: 1 by 20. Ole Miss: 1 by 100. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. Idaho: 3 by 93.3. Texas State: 4 by 35. Arkansas State: 4 by 100. UL Monroe: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins31.5 · n=2 · -21.9 vs Losses
Losses53.4 · n=7 · +21.9 vs Wins
First Half33.6 · n=5 · -33.6 vs Second Half
Second Half67.3 · n=4 · +33.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/5 | @ UL Monroe2+ TD | L 35-42 | — | 3 | 96 | 32 | 32 | 2 | 76 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Arkansas State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 28-52 | — | 4 | 110 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Texas State | W 31-21 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs Idaho | W 55-48 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Georgia Southern | L 26-56 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Ole Miss | L 3-52 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ New Mexico | L 29-38 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs UTEP | L 47-50 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Georgia State | L 32-34 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
New Mexico State
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 206 | 43.5 | 12.8 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 0 | — | — | -206 |
| 2015 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 437 | 80.1 | 13.2 | 437 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UL Monroe
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 50 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia State
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.
#5
Boston College
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 47.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · New Mexico State
437 primary output · 80.1 efficiency · 13.2 usage
62
#2
2013 Regular Season · New Mexico State
35.5
206 primary · 43.5 efficiency · 12.8 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · New Mexico State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
643
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.