Usage / Role
95%
Featured defensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2016UTEP
LB • 6'4" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Nick Usher shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Usage / Role
95%
Featured defensive role
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a linebacker
Reliability
64
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
85
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Nick Usher built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a linebacker from Los Angeles, CA wearing No. 36, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Nick Usher's career was his defensive production: 76...
Read the storyNick Usher, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Nick Usher shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 76 | 8 | 5.5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 71.9 |
Related Context
Nick Usher played LB for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Nick Usher recorded 76 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 19.5 primary output with 42.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 42.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
42.7
Usage
14.7
Consistency
44.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 0. Texas: 4. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Louisiana Tech: 3. Florida International: 1.5. UTSA: 3.5. Old Dominion: 0. Houston Christian: 3. Florida Atlantic: 3. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 7 by 29.2. Texas: 7 by 69.2. Army: 4 by 16.7. Southern Miss: 8 by 43.3. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 63.3. Florida International: 9 by 52.5. UTSA: 9 by 72.5. Old Dominion: 4 by 16.7. Houston Christian: 6 by 55. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 55. Rice: 4 by 16.7. North Texas: 4 by 21.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
72.5 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs North Texas | W 52-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 24-44 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Florida AtlanticSplash game | L 31-35 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Houston ChristianSplash game | W 42-10 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Old Dominion | L 21-31 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UTSASplash game | W 52-49 | 9 | 6 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Florida International | L 21-35 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Louisiana TechSplash game | L 7-28 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-34 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Army | L 14-66 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas2+ sacks · Splash game | L 7-41 | 7 | 6 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs New Mexico State | W 38-22 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Nick Usher built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a linebacker from Los Angeles, CA wearing No. 36, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Nick Usher's career was his defensive production: 76 tackles, 8 tackles for loss, 5.5 sacks, and 2 passes defended across 12 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with UTEP. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Nick Usher's production has multiple signals. His career also includes 2 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 12 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UTEP.
The arc is straightforward: Nick Usher moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 19.5 | 42.7 | 14.7 | 19.5 |
#1 Featured game
@ Texas
Week 2 · L 7-41
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Havoc Plays
89.7 takeover
4 disruption/tackle impact with 89.7 takeover score.
#2
@ UTSA
Week 8 · W 52-49 · Conference game
3.5
Havoc Plays
86.7 takeover
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 86.7 takeover score.
#3
@ Louisiana Tech
Week 5 · L 7-28 · Conference game
3
Havoc Plays
79.4 takeover
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 79.4 takeover score.
#4
@ Florida Atlantic
Week 11 · L 31-35 · Conference game
3
Havoc Plays
76.7 takeover
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 76.7 takeover score.
#5
vs Houston Christian
Week 10 · W 42-10
3
Havoc Plays
76.7 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 76.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
19.5 primary output · 42.7 efficiency · 14.7 usage
71.9
#2
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
6
Impact games
5
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.