Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2013-2017UTEP
Brandon Moss
WR • 6'3" • 190 lbs • El Paso, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Brandon Moss reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
0
Consistency
66.7
Season Value
24.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Moss, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP. Brandon Moss reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
-4
Efficiency
0
Usage
5.6
Consistency
66.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
0 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/16 | vs Arizona | L 16-63 | — | 1 | -4 | -4 | -4 | 0 | -4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | -4 | 0 | 5.6 | -4 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
-4
Primary metric
-4 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico State
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7333
Chapin · El Paso, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
-4
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.