Usage Score
16.5
Player Dossier
2013-2017Ball State
Anthony Winbush
DE • 6'1" • 240 lbs • Indianapolis, IN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Anthony Winbush shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
39.4
Consistency
48.8
Season Value
39.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Ball State
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Winbush, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Ball State. Anthony Winbush shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Ball State paired 28 primary output with 39.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 39.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Ball State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.3
Efficiency
39.4
Usage
16.5
Consistency
48.8
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 7. UAB: 4.5. Unknown: 4.5. Western Kentucky: 2. Western Michigan: 0. Akron: 0. Central Michigan: 5. Toledo: 0. Eastern Michigan: 2. Northern Illinois: 0. Buffalo: 2. Miami (OH): 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 7 by 79.2. UAB: 6 by 70. Unknown: 7 by 74.2. Western Kentucky: 2 by 28.3. Western Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Central Michigan: 7 by 79.2. Toledo: 2 by 8.3. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Northern Illinois: 2 by 8.3. Buffalo: 5 by 40.8. Miami (OH): 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses1.9 · Games = 10
First Half3 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · Games = 6 · -1.3 vs First Half
All Games2.3 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | vs Miami (OH) | L 7-28 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/17 | vs Buffalo | L 24-40 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/10 | @ Northern Illinois | L 17-63 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 14-56 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/26 | vs Toledo | L 17-58 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Central Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | L 9-56 | 7 | 3 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Akron | L 3-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Western Michigan | L 3-55 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Western Kentucky | L 21-33 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown2+ sacks · Splash game | — | 7 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UABSplash game | W 51-31 | 6 | 3 | — | 3 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Illinois2+ sacks · Splash game | L 21-24 | 7 | 5 | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ball State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ball State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ball State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ball State | 20 | 25 | 8.4 | 20 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ball State | 28 | 39.4 | 16.5 | 8 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 71 takeover score.
#2
Central Michigan
5
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
4.5
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
4.5
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
#5
UAB
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Ball State
28 primary output · 39.4 efficiency · 16.5 usage
39.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ball State
26.4
20 primary · 25 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Ball State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
7
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
75
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.