Usage Score
7.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Ball State
WR • 6'0" • Chicago, IL, USA
Cywettnie Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.8
Efficiency
100
Consistency
43.7
Season Value
61.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Ball State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cywettnie Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Ball State. Cywettnie Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Ball State paired 168 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
42
Efficiency
100
Usage
7.8
Consistency
43.7
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 0. Buffalo: 43. Western Michigan: 20. Eastern Michigan: 105
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ball State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ball State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ball State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ball State | 61 | 63.4 | 5.2 | 61 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ball State | 168 | 100 | 7.8 | 107 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia State
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Ball State
168 primary output · 100 efficiency · 7.8 usage
61.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Ball State
30.1
61 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Ball State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
229
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cywettnie Brown quick answers