Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2014-2016Rutgers
Hayden Rettig
QB • 6'3" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Hayden Rettig is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
59.9
Consistency
54
Season Value
54.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hayden Rettig, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers. Hayden Rettig is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 232 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with 72 yards of offense and 76.2 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
58
Efficiency
59.9
Usage
6.4
Consistency
54
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 127. Ohio State: 72. Wisconsin: 39. Michigan: -6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 13 by 87.5. Ohio State: 7 by 76.2. Wisconsin: 8 by 51. Michigan: 4 by 25
Split Comparison
Losses35 · n=3
First Half99.5 · n=2 · +83 vs Second Half
Second Half16.5 · n=2 · -83 vs First Half
All Games58 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Unknown
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 232 | 59.9 | 6.4 | 232 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -232 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with 72 yards of offense and 76.2 efficiency.
72
Primary metric
72 total offense with 76.2 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
127
Primary metric
Game with 127 yards of offense and 87.5 efficiency.
127 total offense with 87.5 efficiency.
#3
Wisconsin
39
Primary metric
Loss with 39 yards of offense and 51 efficiency.
39 total offense with 51 efficiency.
#4
Michigan
-6
Primary metric
Loss with -6 yards of offense and 25 efficiency.
-6 total offense with 25 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
232 primary output · 59.9 efficiency · 6.4 usage
54.7
#2
2014 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
2
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
232
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.