Usage / Role
60%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2013-2016UTSA
RB • 5'9" • Converse, TX, USA
Jarveon Williams leans workhorse runner traits and 46.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
60%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
82
High-end production for a back
Reliability
61
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
81
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
Jarveon Williams built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a running back from Converse, TX wearing No. 2, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Jarveon Williams' career was his backfield work: 2,393...
Read the storyJarveon Williams, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. Jarveon Williams leans workhorse runner traits and 46.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 260 | 126 | 134 | 1 | 39.1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 8 | 449 | 325 | 124 | 3 | 47.3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 1,102 | 1,042 | 60 | 8 | 75 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 13 | 134 | 125 | 9 | 0 | 77.1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 13 | 987 | 775 | 212 | 9 | 77.1 |
Related Context
Jarveon Williams played RB for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jarveon Williams recorded 3 passing yards, 2,393 rushing yards, and 539 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 1,121 primary output with 46.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Loss with 170 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
100.2
Efficiency
59.5
Usage
28.4
Consistency
60.9
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 79. Kansas State: 35. Oklahoma State: 90. Colorado State: 170. UTEP: 178. Louisiana Tech: 37. Southern Miss: 88. North Texas: 52. Old Dominion: 24. Charlotte: 186. Rice: 163
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 21 by 39.2. Kansas State: 11 by 32.6. Oklahoma State: 17 by 55.1. Colorado State: 13 by 100. UTEP: 33 by 52.2. Louisiana Tech: 18 by 19.1. Southern Miss: 16 by 57.3. North Texas: 7 by 81. Old Dominion: 5 by 50. Charlotte: 19 by 90.8. Rice: 22 by 77.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Colorado State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/22 | vs Rice100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 34-24 | 22 | 163 | 7.40 | 2 | — | — | 7.4 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Charlotte100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-27 | 19 | 186 | 9.80 | 1 | — | — | 9.8 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Old Dominion | L 31-36 | 5 | 24 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ North Texas | L 23-30 | 6 | 51 | 8.50 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.4 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Southern Miss | L 10-32 | 16 | 88 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 31-34 | 16 | 27 | 1.70 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 2.1 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ UTEP100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 25-6 | 28 | 133 | 4.80 | 1 | 5 | 45 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Colorado State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 31-33 | 13 | 170 | 13.10 | 2 | — | — | 13.1 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-69 | 17 | 90 | 5.30 | 1 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Kansas State | L 3-30 | 10 | 31 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3.2 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Arizona | L 32-42 | 21 | 79 | 3.80 | 0 | — | — | 3.8 |
Player Story
Jarveon Williams built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a running back from Converse, TX wearing No. 2, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Jarveon Williams' career was his backfield work: 2,393 rushing yards, 474 carries, 19 rushing touchdowns, and 539 receiving yards across 43 career games in the available record. His career also includes 3 passing yards, 539 receiving yards, and 531 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Jarveon Williams' career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 260 | 51 | 7.2 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 449 | 47.5 | 18.6 | 189 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,102 | 59.5 | 28.4 | 653 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 1,121 | 46.5 | 29.9 | 19 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,121 | 46.5 | 29.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs New Mexico
Week 1 · L 20-23 · Postseason
Loss with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134
Scrimmage Yards
93.9 takeover
134 scrimmage yards and 35.4 usage.
#2
vs Southern Miss
Week 6 · W 55-32 · Conference game
129
Scrimmage Yards
93.3 takeover
Win with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
129 scrimmage yards and 35.6 usage.
#3
vs Colorado State
Week 4 · L 31-33
170
Scrimmage Yards
92.6 takeover
Loss with 170 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
170 scrimmage yards and 30.2 usage.
#4
@ Charlotte
Week 11 · W 30-27 · Conference game
186
Scrimmage Yards
91.9 takeover
Win with 186 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
186 scrimmage yards and 29.7 usage.
#5
vs Rice
Week 12 · W 34-24 · Conference game
163
Scrimmage Yards
88.3 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
163 scrimmage yards and 40.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · UTSA
1,121 primary output · 46.5 efficiency · 29.9 usage
77.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
77.1
1,121 primary · 46.5 efficiency · 29.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
75
1,102 primary · 59.5 efficiency · 28.4 usage
8
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
5
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.