Usage Score
23.6
Player Dossier
2013-2015Middle Tennessee
Ed'Marques Batties
WR • 6'0" • Fresno, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ed'Marques Batties reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
69
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
13141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ed'Marques Batties, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Ed'Marques Batties reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 1,048 primary output with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
80.6
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
23.6
Consistency
69
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 88. Unknown: 123. Alabama: 28. Charlotte: 120. Illinois: 175. Vanderbilt: 82. Western Kentucky: 44. Florida International: 7. Louisiana Tech: 111. Marshall: 88. Florida Atlantic: 36. North Texas: 64. UTSA: 82
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Unknown: 8 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 46.7. Charlotte: 5 by 100. Illinois: 13 by 89.7. Vanderbilt: 10 by 54.7. Western Kentucky: 9 by 32.6. Florida International: 2 by 23.3. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 82.2. Marshall: 4 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 80. North Texas: 4 by 100. UTSA: 6 by 91.1
Split Comparison
Wins66.2 · n=6 · -21.8 vs Losses
Losses88 · n=6 · +21.8 vs Wins
First Half94.3 · n=7 · +29.6 vs Second Half
Second Half64.7 · n=6 · -29.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/24 | @ Western Michigan | L 31-45 | — | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ UTSA | W 42-7 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs North Texas | W 41-7 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 24-17 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Marshall | W 27-24 | — | 4 | 88 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 16-45 | — | 9 | 111 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 33 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Florida International | W 42-34 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Western KentuckyHigh volume | L 28-58 | — | 9 | 44 | 4.9 | 4.90 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs VanderbiltHigh volume | L 13-17 | — | 10 | 82 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | L 25-27 | — | 13 | 175 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 2 | 42 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Charlotte100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 73-14 | — | 5 | 120 | 24 | 24 | 3 | 59 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Alabama | L 10-37 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 2 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 474 | 67.7 | 23.6 | 474 |
| 2015 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 1,048 | 76.9 | 23.6 | 574 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 1,048 | 76.9 | 23.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
175
Primary metric
175 receiving yards with a 89.7 efficiency score.
#2
Florida International
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
123
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 83.8 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
1,048 primary output · 76.9 efficiency · 23.6 usage
67.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
67.4
1,048 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 23.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
50
474 primary · 67.7 efficiency · 23.6 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,522
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.