Usage Score
22.3
Player Profile
QB • 6'4" • 220 lbs • Cumming, GA, USA
A.J. Erdely is a balanced quarterback profile with 22.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
22.3
Efficiency
62.4
Consistency
72.3
Season Value
57.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UAB
Quick Facts
A.J. Erdely, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UAB. A.J. Erdely is a balanced quarterback profile with 22.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
UAB paired 2,651 primary output with 61 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Middle Tennessee, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 303 yards of offense and 74.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
178.7
Efficiency
62.4
Usage
22.3
Consistency
72.3
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 244. Coastal Carolina: 217. Tulane: 233. Charlotte: 235. Louisiana Tech: 212. Rice: 303. North Texas: 212. UTEP: 98. Texas A&M: -9. Middle Tennessee: 42
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 32 by 68. Coastal Carolina: 38 by 58.8. Tulane: 37 by 55.8. Charlotte: 26 by 75.6. Louisiana Tech: 37 by 55.6. Rice: 26 by 74.2. North Texas: 36 by 62.9. UTEP: 20 by 66.2. Texas A&M: 1 by 66.7. Middle Tennessee: 30 by 40.6
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
75.6 vs Charlotte
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-27 | 9 | 20 | 90 | 45.0 | 0 | 1 | 40.6 | 10 | -48 | -4.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Texas A&M | L 20-41 | 1 | 1 | -9 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 66.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 19-0 | 10 | 18 | 79 | 55.6 | 0 | 1 | 66.2 | 2 | 19 | 9.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs North Texas | W 29-21 | 14 | 22 | 189 | 63.6 | 0 | 0 | 62.9 | 14 | 23 | 1.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Rice3+ TD | W 42-0 | 11 | 17 | 274 | 64.7 | 2 | 0 | 74.2 | 9 | 29 | 3.20 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana TechDual-threat | W 28-7 | 8 | 24 | 136 | 33.3 | 1 | 1 | 55.6 | 13 | 76 | 5.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Charlotte | W 28-7 | 13 | 16 | 214 | 81.3 | 1 | 0 | 75.6 | 10 | 21 | 2.10 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs TulaneDual-threat | W 31-24 | 12 | 27 | 180 | 44.4 | 1 | 2 | 55.8 | 10 | 53 | 5.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal CarolinaDual-threat | L 24-47 | 12 | 26 | 149 | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 58.8 | 12 | 68 | 5.70 | 1 | 24 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 22 | 28 | 228 | 78.6 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2011-2014
Opening stop
UAB
2017-2018
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 29 | 42.3 | 4.2 | 29 |
| 2017 Postseason | UAB | 2,651 | 61 | 22.6 | 2,622 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 2,651 | 61 | 22.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 1,787 | 62.4 | 22.3 | -864 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Loss with 11 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
11
Primary metric
11 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Rice
303
Primary metric
Win with 303 yards of offense and 74.2 efficiency.
303 total offense with 74.2 efficiency.
#3
North Texas
320
Primary metric
Loss with 320 yards of offense and 52.6 efficiency.
320 total offense with 52.6 efficiency.
#4
Charlotte
235
Primary metric
Win with 235 yards of offense and 75.6 efficiency.
235 total offense with 75.6 efficiency.
#5
Ohio
285
Primary metric
Loss with 285 yards of offense and 65.6 efficiency.
285 total offense with 65.6 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · UAB
2,651 primary output · 61 efficiency · 22.6 usage
66.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · UAB
66.5
2,651 primary · 61 efficiency · 22.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UAB
57.9
1,787 primary · 62.4 efficiency · 22.3 usage
3
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
4,467
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
A.J. Erdely quick answers