Usage Score
11.3
Player Dossier
2013-2017Minnesota
Nate Wozniak
TE • 6'10" • 280 lbs • Greenwood, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Nate Wozniak reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70
Consistency
34.3
Season Value
48.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Minnesota
13141515161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Minnesota
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Wozniak, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Minnesota. Nate Wozniak reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Minnesota
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
20.8
Efficiency
70
Usage
11.3
Consistency
34.3
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 5. Middle Tennessee: 52. Maryland: 29. Michigan State: 8. Iowa: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 1 by 33.3. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 100. Maryland: 2 by 96.7. Michigan State: 1 by 53.3. Iowa: 1 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins28.5 · n=2 · +12.8 vs Losses
Losses15.7 · n=3 · -12.8 vs Wins
First Half28.7 · n=3 · +19.7 vs Second Half
Second Half9 · n=2 · -19.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Middle Tennessee
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Minnesota
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Minnesota | 75 | 56.4 | 7.9 | 75 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Minnesota | 75 | 56.4 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Minnesota | 135 | 62.2 | 10.5 | 60 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Minnesota | 135 | 62.2 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Minnesota | 104 | 70 | 11.3 | -31 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52
Primary metric
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
26
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Minnesota
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2016 Postseason · Minnesota
56.1
135 primary · 62.2 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Minnesota
56.1
135 primary · 62.2 efficiency · 10.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8456
Center Grove · Greenwood, IN
- Committed To
- Minnesota
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
314
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.