Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2016-2017Houston
Alex Leslie
TE • 6'5" • 240 lbs • New Braunfels, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Alex Leslie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
40
Consistency
100
Season Value
39.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Houston
1617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Leslie, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Houston. Alex Leslie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Houston paired 47 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Houston
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
6
Efficiency
40
Usage
4
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
40 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/24 | @ Texas State | W 64-3 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 6 | 40 | 4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 47 | 86.7 | 4.6 | 41 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36
Primary metric
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas State
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Houston
47 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 4.6 usage
63.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Houston
39.1
6 primary · 40 efficiency · 4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8086
New Braunfels · New Braunfels, TX
- Committed To
- Iowa State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
53
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.