Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2013-2016Ball State
Aaron Hepp
WR • 6'1" • Indianapolis, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Aaron Hepp reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.8
Consistency
18.8
Season Value
50.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Ball State
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aaron Hepp, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Ball State. Aaron Hepp reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Ball State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Ball State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
13.7
Efficiency
74.8
Usage
11
Consistency
18.8
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia State: 0. Indiana: 0. Unknown: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Central Michigan: 54. Buffalo: 34. Akron: 17. Western Michigan: 16. Eastern Michigan: 0. Toledo: 39. Miami (OH): 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Akron: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 3 by 35.6. Toledo: 3 by 86.7. Miami (OH): 1 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins11.3 · Games = 3 · -4.9 vs Losses
Losses16.3 · Games = 8 · +4.9 vs Wins
First Half9 · Games = 6 · -9.3 vs Second Half
Second Half18.3 · Games = 6 · +9.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/23 | @ Miami (OH) | L 20-21 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 11/17 | @ Toledo | L 19-37 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 27 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 41-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/2 | vs Western Michigan | L 20-52 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Akron | L 25-35 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Buffalo | W 31-21 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Central Michigan | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Northern Illinois | L 24-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 31-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Indiana | L 20-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Georgia State | W 31-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ball State | 29 | 96.7 | 8 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ball State | 57 | 75.4 | 12.9 | 28 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ball State | 0 | — | — | -57 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ball State | 164 | 74.8 | 11 | 164 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Primary metric
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
38
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 50.7 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Ball State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2013 Regular Season · Ball State
55.4
29 primary · 96.7 efficiency · 8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Ball State
50.3
164 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
250
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.