Usage Score
14.5
Player Dossier
2013-2015Utah
Bubba Poole
WR • 6'1" • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Bubba Poole reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
43.4
Consistency
41.9
Season Value
29.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Utah
1314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Utah
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bubba Poole, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Utah. Bubba Poole reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Utah paired 145 primary output with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Utah
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
11.2
Efficiency
43.4
Usage
14.5
Consistency
41.9
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 0. Michigan: 22. Utah State: 12. Fresno State: 7. Oregon: 9. California: 6. Arizona State: 8. USC: 3. Oregon State: 0. Washington: 0. Arizona: 34. UCLA: 21. Colorado: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 3 by 48.9. Utah State: 1 by 80. Fresno State: 2 by 23.3. Oregon: 1 by 60. California: 2 by 20. Arizona State: 1 by 53.3. USC: 3 by 6.7. Arizona: 4 by 56.7. UCLA: 3 by 46.7. Colorado: 4 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Wins8.7 · n=10 · -10.6 vs Losses
Losses19.3 · n=3 · +10.6 vs Wins
First Half9.1 · n=7 · -4.4 vs Second Half
Second Half13.5 · n=6 · +4.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
80 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | vs BYU | W 35-28 | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Colorado | W 20-14 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs UCLA | L 9-17 | — | 3 | 21 | 4.3 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Arizona | L 30-37 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Washington | W 34-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Oregon State | W 27-12 | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | @ USC | L 24-42 | — | 3 | 3 | 1.3 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Arizona State | W 34-18 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs California | W 30-24 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/27 | @ Oregon | W 62-20 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ Fresno State | W 45-24 | — | 2 | 7 | 7.3 | 3.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Utah State | W 24-14 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 9/4 | vs Michigan | W 24-17 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Utah
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah | 229 | 45.1 | 19.2 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Utah | 93 | 31.1 | 10.7 | -136 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah | 93 | 31.1 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Utah | 145 | 43.4 | 14.5 | 52 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah | 145 | 43.4 | 14.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75
Primary metric
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Stanford
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 71.4 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 38.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Utah
145 primary output · 43.4 efficiency · 14.5 usage
29.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Utah
29.3
145 primary · 43.4 efficiency · 14.5 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Utah
29
229 primary · 45.1 efficiency · 19.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
467
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.