Usage Score
27.7
Player Dossier
2012-2013North Texas
Darnell Smith
WR • 6'1" • Garland, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Darnell Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.9
Consistency
68.6
Season Value
67.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · North Texas
121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darnell Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · North Texas. Darnell Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
North Texas paired 791 primary output with 74.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · North Texas
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
65.9
Efficiency
74.9
Usage
27.7
Consistency
68.6
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 75. Idaho: 79. Ohio: 89. Ball State: 64. Georgia: 39. Tulane: 130. Middle Tennessee: 44. Louisiana Tech: 65. Southern Miss: 8. UTEP: 32. UTSA: 115. Tulsa: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 5 by 100. Idaho: 4 by 100. Ohio: 9 by 65.9. Ball State: 9 by 47.4. Georgia: 6 by 43.3. Tulane: 8 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 58.7. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 53.3. UTEP: 3 by 71.1. UTSA: 13 by 59. Tulsa: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins52.3 · n=8 · -41 vs Losses
Losses93.3 · n=4 · +41 vs Wins
First Half79.3 · n=6 · +26.8 vs Second Half
Second Half52.5 · n=6 · -26.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs UNLV | W 36-14 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Tulsa | W 42-10 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-21 | — | 13 | 115 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UTEP | W 41-7 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Southern Miss | W 55-14 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-13 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 34-7 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-24 | — | 8 | 130 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Georgia | L 21-45 | — | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Ball StateHigh volume | W 34-27 | — | 9 | 64 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ OhioHigh volume | L 21-27 | — | 9 | 89 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Idaho | W 40-6 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 379 | 73.8 | 15 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | North Texas | 791 | 74.9 | 27.7 | 412 |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 791 | 74.9 | 27.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas State
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 59 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 65.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · North Texas
791 primary output · 74.9 efficiency · 27.7 usage
67.8
#2
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
67.8
791 primary · 74.9 efficiency · 27.7 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · North Texas
46.2
379 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 15 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,170
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.