Usage Score
3.6
Player Dossier
2012-2016Tulsa
Jerry Uwaezuoke
DT • 6'3" • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jerry Uwaezuoke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.4
Consistency
5.6
Season Value
8.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerry Uwaezuoke, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa. Jerry Uwaezuoke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Tulsa paired 2.5 primary output with 18.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
18.4
Usage
3.6
Consistency
5.6
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 0. San José State: 2. Ohio State: 0. Unknown: 0. Fresno State: 0. SMU: 0. Houston: 0. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 0. East Carolina: 0. Navy: 0. Cincinnati: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. San José State: 4 by 36.7. Ohio State: 6 by 25. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Fresno State: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 6 by 25. Tulane: 5 by 20.8. Memphis: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Navy: 10 by 41.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 25.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.3 · n=8 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=3 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · n=6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.1 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
San José State
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/19 | vs Central Michigan | W 55-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Cincinnati | W 40-37 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Navy10+ tackles | L 40-42 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | vs East Carolina | W 45-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Memphis | W 59-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tulane | W 50-27 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Houston | L 31-38 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs SMU | W 43-40 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Fresno State | W 48-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 3-48 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs San José State | W 45-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 2.5 | 18.4 | 3.6 | 2.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2.5 | 18.4 | 3.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
San José State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#2
Cincinnati
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 19.3 takeover score.
#3
Navy
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 15.9 takeover score.
#4
Ohio State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.5 takeover score.
#5
Houston
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
2.5 primary output · 18.4 efficiency · 3.6 usage
8.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
8.3
2.5 primary · 18.4 efficiency · 3.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Tulsa
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
47
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.