Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
Jaquan White
WR • 5'10" • Dallas, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jaquan White reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
10
Season Value
23.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaquan White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP. Jaquan White reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTEP paired 494 primary output with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
5.9
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
8.4
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 36. Texas: 4. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 10. Louisiana Tech: 0. Florida International: 9. UTSA: 0. Old Dominion: 0. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. Texas: 1 by 26.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 66.7. Florida International: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins12 · n=3 · +8.7 vs Losses
Losses3.3 · n=7 · -8.7 vs Wins
First Half10 · n=5 · +8.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=5 · -8.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs North Texas | W 52-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 24-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Old Dominion | L 21-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UTSA | W 52-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Florida International | L 21-35 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 7-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-34 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Army | L 14-66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | L 7-41 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs New Mexico State | W 38-22 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 95 | 67.8 | 10.5 | 95 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 494 | 63 | 19.1 | 399 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 59 | 63.4 | 8.4 | -435 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico State
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
494 primary output · 63 efficiency · 19.1 usage
59.8
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
30.1
95 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
23.3
59 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
648
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.