Usage Score
19.8
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTEP
Jarrad Shaw
WR • 5'9" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jarrad Shaw reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.9
Consistency
43.4
Season Value
58
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · UTEP
12131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarrad Shaw, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · UTEP. Jarrad Shaw reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
UTEP paired 168 primary output with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · UTEP
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
28
Efficiency
68.9
Usage
19.8
Consistency
43.4
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 4. New Mexico: 76. Texas Tech: 43. New Mexico State: 23. UTSA: 16. Southern Miss: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 1 by 26.7. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Texas Tech: 3 by 95.6. New Mexico State: 3 by 51.1. UTSA: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins30.3 · n=4 · +6.8 vs Losses
Losses23.5 · n=2 · -6.8 vs Wins
First Half41 · n=3 · +26 vs Second Half
Second Half15 · n=3 · -26 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | UTEP | 168 | 68.9 | 19.8 | 168 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 168 | 68.9 | 19.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas Tech
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 51.1 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · UTEP
168 primary output · 68.9 efficiency · 19.8 usage
58
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
58
168 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 19.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
168
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.