Usage Score
18.5
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTEP
Ian Hamilton
WR • 6'5" • Pasadena, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ian Hamilton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.3
Consistency
38
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · UTEP
12131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ian Hamilton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · UTEP. Ian Hamilton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
UTEP paired 585 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · UTEP
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
48.8
Efficiency
86.3
Usage
18.5
Consistency
38
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 79. New Mexico: 13. Texas Tech: 5. New Mexico State: 45. Kansas State: 112. Louisiana Tech: 15. Old Dominion: 18. UTSA: 28. Southern Miss: 27. Western Kentucky: 91. North Texas: 22. Rice: 130
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 28.9. Texas Tech: 1 by 33.3. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100. Old Dominion: 1 by 100. UTSA: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 100. Western Kentucky: 2 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 73.3. Rice: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins25.5 · n=6 · -46.5 vs Losses
Losses72 · n=6 · +46.5 vs Wins
First Half44.8 · n=6 · -7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half52.7 · n=6 · +7.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Utah State | L 6-21 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Rice100 receiving yards | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 130 | 32.5 | 32.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs North Texas | W 35-17 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Western Kentucky | L 27-35 | — | 2 | 91 | 45.5 | 45.50 | 0 | 69 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Southern Miss | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ UTSA | W 34-0 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Old Dominion | W 42-35 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 3-55 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kansas State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 28-58 | — | 5 | 112 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 2 | 69 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-24 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Texas Tech | L 26-30 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ New Mexico | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 42 | 50.8 | 7.6 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 354 | 69.7 | 22.6 | 312 |
| 2014 Postseason | UTEP | 585 | 86.3 | 18.5 | 231 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 585 | 86.3 | 18.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108
Primary metric
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kansas State
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#5
Western Kentucky
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · UTEP
585 primary output · 86.3 efficiency · 18.5 usage
60.7
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
60.7
585 primary · 86.3 efficiency · 18.5 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
53.2
354 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 22.6 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
981
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.