Usage Score
18.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016Rice
Zach Wright
WR • 6'1" • The Woodlands, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Zach Wright reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
45.9
Consistency
25.9
Season Value
37
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rice
121314141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zach Wright, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rice. Zach Wright reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Rice paired 554 primary output with 84.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 45.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Rice
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
36
Efficiency
45.9
Usage
18.5
Consistency
25.9
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 16. Baylor: 3. North Texas: 120. Southern Miss: 34. UTSA: 12. Louisiana Tech: 5. Charlotte: 111. UTEP: 16. Stanford: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 3 by 35.6. Baylor: 2 by 10. North Texas: 10 by 80. Southern Miss: 3 by 75.6. UTSA: 2 by 40. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 33.3. Charlotte: 12 by 61.7. UTEP: 2 by 53.3. Stanford: 2 by 23.3
Split Comparison
Wins63.5 · n=2 · +35.4 vs Losses
Losses28.1 · n=7 · -35.4 vs Wins
First Half37 · n=5 · +2.3 vs Second Half
Second Half34.8 · n=4 · -2.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
80 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Stanford | L 17-41 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTEP | W 44-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Charlotte100 receiving yards · High volume | W 22-21 | — | 12 | 111 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 16-61 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UTSA | L 13-14 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Southern Miss | L 28-44 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-42 | — | 10 | 120 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Baylor | L 10-38 | — | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Western Kentucky | L 14-46 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Rice | 299 | 72.9 | 15.9 | 299 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 299 | 72.9 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 554 | 84.5 | 21.7 | 255 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 324 | 45.9 | 18.5 | -230 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116
Primary metric
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
North Texas
120
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Old Dominion
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
111
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 61.7 efficiency score.
#5
Army
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 87.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Rice
554 primary output · 84.5 efficiency · 21.7 usage
67.8
#2
2014 Postseason · Rice
50.7
299 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Rice
50.7
299 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,177
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.