Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2012-2015Toledo
Alonzo Russell
WR • 6'4" • Washington, DC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Alonzo Russell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
95.3
Consistency
66.8
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Toledo
12121314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alonzo Russell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Toledo. Alonzo Russell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Toledo paired 960 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 95.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Toledo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
51.5
Efficiency
95.3
Usage
15.4
Consistency
66.8
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 32. Arkansas: 32. Iowa State: 32. Arkansas State: 60. Ball State: 45. Kent State: 58. Eastern Michigan: 43. Massachusetts: 96. Northern Illinois: 30. Central Michigan: 86. Bowling Green: 74. Western Michigan: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 3 by 71.1. Arkansas: 1 by 100. Iowa State: 2 by 100. Arkansas State: 5 by 80. Ball State: 2 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 96.7. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 95.6. Massachusetts: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 2 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins55.8 · n=10 · +25.8 vs Losses
Losses30 · n=2 · -25.8 vs Wins
First Half43.2 · n=6 · -16.7 vs Second Half
Second Half59.8 · n=6 · +16.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/23 | vs Temple | W 32-17 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Western Michigan | L 30-35 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 16 |
| Tue 11/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-28 | — | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 1 | 47 |
| Wed 11/11 | @ Central Michigan | W 28-23 | — | 4 | 86 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 51 |
| Wed 11/4 | vs Northern Illinois | L 27-32 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Massachusetts | W 51-35 | — | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 63-20 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Kent State | W 38-7 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Ball State | W 24-10 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Arkansas State | W 37-7 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 33 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Iowa State | W 30-23 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Arkansas | W 16-12 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201220132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Toledo | 960 | 92.8 | 20.7 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Toledo | 960 | 92.8 | 20.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 728 | 76.7 | 28.5 | -232 |
| 2014 Postseason | Toledo | 770 | 80.3 | 21.1 | 42 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 770 | 80.3 | 21.1 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 618 | 95.3 | 15.4 | -152 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 618 | 95.3 | 15.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
152
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
147
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Toledo
960 primary output · 92.8 efficiency · 20.7 usage
69.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · Toledo
69.8
960 primary · 92.8 efficiency · 20.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Toledo
61.6
728 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 28.5 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.863
Frank W. Cox · Virginia Beach, VA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,076
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.