Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2015UTSA
RB • 5'6" • Fort Worth, TX, USA
Brian Vaughn leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.2 efficiency.
Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a back
Reliability
9
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
16
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Brian Vaughn, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA. Brian Vaughn leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.2 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 101 | 72 | 29 | 0 | 52.4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 4 | 56 | 45 | 11 | 0 | 48.1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 2 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 35.2 |
Related Context
Brian Vaughn played RB for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Brian Vaughn recorded 133 rushing yards and 40 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTSA paired 101 primary output with 61.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 38.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
14
Efficiency
38.9
Usage
7
Consistency
78
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 13. Houston: 5. UAB: 19. Tulane: 19
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 24.3. Houston: 1 by 52.1. UAB: 5 by 39.6. Tulane: 5 by 39.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
52.1 vs Houston
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 101 | 61.9 | 3.3 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 56 | 38.9 | 7 | -45 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | -56 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 16 | 45.2 | 3.2 | 16 |
#1 Featured game
@ Louisiana Tech
Week 10 · L 27-51 · Conference game
Loss with 50 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
50
Scrimmage Yards
71.8 takeover
50 scrimmage yards and 5.4 usage.
#2
vs San José State
Week 8 · L 24-52 · Conference game
36
Scrimmage Yards
59 takeover
Loss with 36 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
36 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#3
vs Tulane
Week 11 · W 10-7 · Conference game
19
Scrimmage Yards
58.7 takeover
Win with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 12.8 usage.
#4
vs UAB
Week 9 · W 52-31 · Conference game
19
Scrimmage Yards
54.6 takeover
Win with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 8.5 usage.
#5
@ Oklahoma State
Week 3 · L 14-69
11
Scrimmage Yards
50.4 takeover
Loss with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 4.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
101 primary output · 61.9 efficiency · 3.3 usage
52.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
48.1
56 primary · 38.9 efficiency · 7 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
35.2
16 primary · 45.2 efficiency · 3.2 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.