Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2012-2016Indiana
Mitchell Paige
WR • 5'7" • Carmel, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mitchell Paige reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.1
Consistency
67
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Indiana
12131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Indiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mitchell Paige, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Indiana. Mitchell Paige reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Indiana paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Indiana
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
49.7
Efficiency
74.1
Usage
22.2
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 42. Florida International: 29. Ball State: 76. Wake Forest: 64. Michigan State: 48. Ohio State: 44. Nebraska: 101. Northwestern: 10. Maryland: 21. Rutgers: 100. Penn State: 43. Michigan: 41. Purdue: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 4 by 70. Florida International: 2 by 96.7. Ball State: 6 by 84.4. Wake Forest: 7 by 61. Michigan State: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 4 by 73.3. Nebraska: 9 by 74.8. Northwestern: 4 by 16.7. Maryland: 2 by 70. Rutgers: 6 by 100. Penn State: 6 by 47.8. Michigan: 4 by 68.3. Purdue: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins50.2 · n=6 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses49.3 · n=7 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half57.7 · n=7 · +17.4 vs Second Half
Second Half40.3 · n=6 · -17.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Utah | L 24-26 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Purdue | W 26-24 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Michigan | L 10-20 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Penn State | L 31-45 | — | 6 | 43 | 6.9 | 7.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 33-27 | — | 6 | 100 | 14 | 16.70 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Maryland | W 42-36 | — | 2 | 21 | 12 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Northwestern | L 14-24 | — | 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Nebraska100 receiving yards · High volume | L 22-27 | — | 9 | 101 | 10.8 | 11.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Ohio State | L 17-38 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Michigan State | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Wake Forest | L 28-33 | — | 7 | 64 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Ball State | W 30-20 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 9/1 | @ Florida International | W 34-13 | — | 2 | 29 | 13.3 | 14.50 | 0 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Indiana
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Indiana | 684 | 72.7 | 20 | 684 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Indiana | 684 | 72.7 | 20 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Indiana | 646 | 74.1 | 22.2 | -38 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Indiana | 646 | 74.1 | 22.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 74.8 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Indiana
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2016 Postseason · Indiana
65.6
646 primary · 74.1 efficiency · 22.2 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Indiana
65.6
646 primary · 74.1 efficiency · 22.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,330
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.