Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2016Cincinnati
RB • 5'9" • Indianapolis, IN, USA
Deionte Buckley leans balanced backfield option traits and 53 efficiency.
Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
13
Developing production for a back
Reliability
4
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
24
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Deionte Buckley, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Deionte Buckley leans balanced backfield option traits and 53 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 58.6 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 4 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 59 |
Related Context
Deionte Buckley played RB for Cincinnati. Across 5 tracked seasons, Deionte Buckley recorded 129 rushing yards and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 97 primary output with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
24.3
Efficiency
53
Usage
8.5
Consistency
58.5
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 0. UCF: 18. Memphis: 49. Tulsa: 30
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 4 by 46.9. Memphis: 7 by 72.9. Tulsa: 8 by 39.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
72.9 vs Memphis
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 32 | 83.3 | 6.3 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | -32 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 97 | 53 | 8.5 | 97 |
#1 Featured game
vs Memphis
Week 12 · L 7-34 · Conference game
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49
Scrimmage Yards
69.2 takeover
49 scrimmage yards and 12.1 usage.
#2
vs Miami (OH)
Week 6 · W 52-14
32
Scrimmage Yards
67.1 takeover
Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 6.3 usage.
#3
@ Tulsa
Week 13 · L 37-40 · Conference game
30
Scrimmage Yards
47.5 takeover
Loss with 30 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
30 scrimmage yards and 14.8 usage.
#4
@ UCF
Week 11 · L 3-24 · Conference game
18
Scrimmage Yards
34.8 takeover
Loss with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18 scrimmage yards and 7.3 usage.
#5
@ Purdue
Week 2 · W 38-20
0
Scrimmage Yards
0 takeover
Win with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 0 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
97 primary output · 53 efficiency · 8.5 usage
59
#2
2012 Regular Season · Cincinnati
58.6
32 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Cincinnati
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.