Usage Score
13.8
Player Profile
Geno Lewis
WR • 6'1" • Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Geno Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.8
Consistency
76.5
Season Value
56.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Penn State
13141415151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Penn State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Penn State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Geno Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Penn State. Geno Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Penn State paired 751 primary output with 73.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
32.3
Efficiency
78.8
Usage
13.8
Consistency
76.5
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 40. Houston: 18. UL Monroe: 8. Ohio State: 28. Texas: 26. Kansas State: 33. Texas Tech: 47. Kansas: 41. Iowa State: 59. Baylor: 35. West Virginia: 25. Oklahoma State: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 2 by 100. Houston: 2 by 60. UL Monroe: 1 by 53.3. Ohio State: 2 by 93.3. Texas: 2 by 86.7. Kansas State: 3 by 73.3. Texas Tech: 3 by 100. Kansas: 4 by 68.3. Iowa State: 6 by 65.6. Baylor: 2 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 83.3. Oklahoma State: 3 by 62.2
Split Comparison
Wins34.2 · n=10 · +11.2 vs Losses
Losses23 · n=2 · -11.2 vs Wins
First Half25.5 · n=6 · -13.7 vs Second Half
Second Half39.2 · n=6 · +13.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/3 | vs Auburn | W 35-19 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Oklahoma State | W 38-20 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ West Virginia | W 56-28 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Baylor | W 45-24 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Iowa State | W 34-24 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Kansas | W 56-3 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Texas Tech | W 66-59 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Kansas State | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Texas | W 45-40 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Ohio State | L 24-45 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UL Monroe | W 59-17 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Houston | L 23-33 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2013-2015
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
2013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Penn State | 234 | 59.7 | 11.8 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Penn State | 751 | 73.5 | 20.4 | 517 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 751 | 73.5 | 20.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Penn State | 196 | 67 | 10.4 | -555 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 196 | 67 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma | 388 | 78.8 | 13.8 | 192 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 388 | 78.8 | 13.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173
Primary metric
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas Tech
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 65.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Penn State
751 primary output · 73.5 efficiency · 20.4 usage
59.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Penn State
59.5
751 primary · 73.5 efficiency · 20.4 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Oklahoma
56.7
388 primary · 78.8 efficiency · 13.8 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9373
Wyoming Valley West · Plymouth, PA
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,569
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.