Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2016Michigan
WR • 6'2" • West Des Moines, IA, USA
Amara Darboh reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
21
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
34
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Michigan
Snapshot
Player Story
Amara Darboh built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a wide receiver from West Des Moines, IA wearing No. 82, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of Amara Darboh's career was his receiving role:...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Amara Darboh, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Michigan. Amara Darboh reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 11 | 36 | 473 | 2 | 65.2 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 13 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 77.6 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 13 | 56 | 703 | 5 | 77.6 |
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 13 | 5 | 36 | 0 | 81 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 13 | 52 | 826 | 7 | 81 |
Related Context
Amara Darboh played WR for Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Amara Darboh recorded 2 rushing yards, 2,062 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Michigan paired 862 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
55.9
Efficiency
79.4
Usage
22.5
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 24. Utah: 101. Oregon State: 50. UNLV: 34. BYU: 57. Maryland: 27. Northwestern: 11. Michigan State: 52. Minnesota: 73. Rutgers: 53. Indiana: 109. Penn State: 68. Ohio State: 68
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 2 by 80. Utah: 8 by 84.2. Oregon State: 4 by 83.3. UNLV: 4 by 56.7. BYU: 4 by 95. Maryland: 3 by 60. Northwestern: 2 by 36.7. Michigan State: 3 by 100. Minnesota: 6 by 81.1. Rutgers: 3 by 100. Indiana: 8 by 90.8. Penn State: 7 by 64.8. Ohio State: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Florida | W 41-7 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Ohio State | L 13-42 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Penn State | W 28-16 | — | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-41 | — | 8 | 109 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Rutgers | W 49-16 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Minnesota | W 29-26 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Michigan State | L 23-27 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Northwestern | W 38-0 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Maryland | W 28-0 | — | 3 | 27 | 6.3 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs BYU | W 31-0 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs UNLV | W 28-7 | — | 4 | 34 | 7.6 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Oregon State | W 35-7 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Utah100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-24 | — | 8 | 101 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 28 |
Player Story
Amara Darboh built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a wide receiver from West Des Moines, IA wearing No. 82, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of Amara Darboh's career was his receiving role: 151 catches, 2,062 receiving yards, 14 touchdowns, and 2 rushing yards across 37 career games in the available record. His career also includes 2 rushing yards and 23 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Amara Darboh's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 473 | 78.2 | 20.4 | 473 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 727 | 79.4 | 22.5 | 254 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 727 | 79.4 | 22.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 862 | 80.8 | 24.1 | 135 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 862 | 80.8 | 24.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Michigan State
Week 9 · W 32-23 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Miami (OH)
Week 3 · W 34-10
88
Receiving Yards
93.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#3
vs Indiana
Week 10 · W 34-10 · Conference game
107
Receiving Yards
93.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 79.3 efficiency score.
#4
@ Utah
Week 1 · L 17-24
101
Receiving Yards
91.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 84.2 efficiency score.
#5
@ Indiana
Week 11 · W 48-41 · Conference game
109
Receiving Yards
90.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 90.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Michigan
862 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 24.1 usage
81
#2
2016 Regular Season · Michigan
81
862 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 24.1 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Michigan
77.6
727 primary · 79.4 efficiency · 22.5 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.