Usage Score
17.9
Player Dossier
2012-2015Washington State
Jeremiah Laufasa
RB • 5'10" • Kirkland, WA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jeremiah Laufasa leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
36.8
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
52.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP
1213131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Washington State • UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremiah Laufasa, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP. Jeremiah Laufasa leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTEP paired 511 primary output with 36.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 36.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington State, UTEP.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 92 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
42.6
Efficiency
36.8
Usage
17.9
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 7. Texas Tech: 37. New Mexico State: 42. Unknown: 31. UTSA: 5. Florida International: 33. Florida Atlantic: 85. Southern Miss: 75. Rice: 92. Old Dominion: 24. Louisiana Tech: 18. North Texas: 62
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 4 by 9.4. Texas Tech: 9 by 32.8. New Mexico State: 7 by 57.5. Unknown: 8 by 40.4. UTSA: 4 by 15.6. Florida International: 11 by 31.3. Florida Atlantic: 20 by 42.4. Southern Miss: 11 by 44.8. Rice: 15 by 63.9. Old Dominion: 6 by 26. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 37.5. North Texas: 16 by 40.4
Split Comparison
Wins70.3 · n=4 · +41.8 vs Losses
Losses28.4 · n=7 · -41.8 vs Wins
First Half25.8 · n=6 · -33.5 vs Second Half
Second Half59.3 · n=6 · +33.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
63.9 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | @ North Texas | W 20-17 | 16 | 62 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 15-17 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Old Dominion | L 21-31 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 4 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Rice | W 24-21 | 15 | 92 | 6.10 | 1 | — | — | 6.1 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-34 | 8 | 21 | 2.60 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 6.8 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 27-17 | 18 | 71 | 3.90 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Florida International | L 12-52 | 11 | 33 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs UTSA | L 6-25 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.3 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ New Mexico State | W 50-47 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 6 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Texas Tech | L 20-69 | 6 | 15 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 4.1 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Arkansas | L 13-48 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2012-2013
Opening stop
- 2
UTEP
2014-2015
Final stop
Season Progression
20122013201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Washington State | 195 | 40.2 | 7.7 | 195 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Washington State | 195 | 40.2 | 7.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 95 | 68.1 | 5.4 | -100 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 511 | 36.8 | 17.9 | 416 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Loss with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
77
Primary metric
77 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#2
Rice
92
Primary metric
Win with 92 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
92 scrimmage yards and 28.8 usage.
#3
Oregon State
54
Primary metric
Loss with 54 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
54 scrimmage yards and 18 usage.
#4
Florida Atlantic
85
Primary metric
Win with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 35.7 usage.
#5
Idaho
45
Primary metric
Win with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
45 scrimmage yards and 15.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
511 primary output · 36.8 efficiency · 17.9 usage
52.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
29.7
95 primary · 68.1 efficiency · 5.4 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Washington State
29.3
195 primary · 40.2 efficiency · 7.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
801
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.