Usage Score
33.1
Player Dossier
2012-2015Wisconsin
Alex Erickson
WR • 6'0" • Darlington, WI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Alex Erickson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.2
Consistency
81.3
Season Value
72.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
12131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Erickson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin. Alex Erickson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 978 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.2
Efficiency
80.2
Usage
33.1
Consistency
81.3
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 54. Alabama: 73. Miami (OH): 73. Troy: 87. Hawai'i: 87. Iowa: 30. Nebraska: 113. Purdue: 86. Illinois: 96. Rutgers: 103. Maryland: 83. Northwestern: 27. Minnesota: 66
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 5 by 72. Alabama: 6 by 81.1. Miami (OH): 5 by 97.3. Troy: 3 by 100. Hawai'i: 9 by 64.4. Iowa: 3 by 66.7. Nebraska: 7 by 100. Purdue: 9 by 63.7. Illinois: 10 by 64. Rutgers: 6 by 100. Maryland: 5 by 100. Northwestern: 3 by 60. Minnesota: 6 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins84.8 · n=10 · +41.5 vs Losses
Losses43.3 · n=3 · -41.5 vs Wins
First Half73.9 · n=7 · -3.0 vs Second Half
Second Half76.8 · n=6 · +3.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | vs USC | W 23-21 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Minnesota | W 31-21 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Northwestern | L 7-13 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Maryland | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 83 | 14 | 16.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 48-10 | — | 6 | 103 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ IllinoisHigh volume | W 24-13 | — | 10 | 96 | 12.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs PurdueHigh volume | W 24-7 | — | 9 | 86 | 9 | 9.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Nebraska100 receiving yards | W 23-21 | — | 7 | 113 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Iowa | L 6-10 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Hawai'iHigh volume | W 28-0 | — | 9 | 87 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Troy | W 28-3 | — | 3 | 87 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Miami (OH) | W 58-0 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Alabama | L 17-35 | — | 6 | 73 | 14 | 12.20 | 1 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 127 | 77 | 8.9 | 127 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 127 | 77 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 772 | 69.6 | 32.3 | 645 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 772 | 69.6 | 32.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 978 | 80.2 | 33.1 | 206 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 978 | 80.2 | 33.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160
Primary metric
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
978 primary output · 80.2 efficiency · 33.1 usage
72.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
72.2
978 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 33.1 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Wisconsin
54.1
772 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 32.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,877
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.