Usage Score
12.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Arizona State
Frederick Gammage
WR • 5'11" • Phoenix, AZ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Frederick Gammage reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.2
Consistency
51.4
Season Value
56.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
121314141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Frederick Gammage, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State. Frederick Gammage reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 334 primary output with 64.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
41.8
Efficiency
64.2
Usage
12.4
Consistency
51.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 31. UTSA: 57. UCLA: 4. Washington State: 10. Oregon: 45. Utah: 68. Washington: 3. Arizona: 116
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 3 by 68.9. UTSA: 2 by 100. UCLA: 1 by 26.7. Washington State: 2 by 33.3. Oregon: 3 by 100. Utah: 2 by 100. Washington: 1 by 20. Arizona: 12 by 64.4
Split Comparison
Wins30.7 · n=3 · -17.7 vs Losses
Losses48.4 · n=5 · +17.7 vs Wins
First Half25.5 · n=4 · -32.5 vs Second Half
Second Half58 · n=4 · +32.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-56 | — | 12 | 116 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Washington | L 18-44 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Fri 11/11 | vs Utah | L 26-49 | — | 2 | 68 | 22.7 | 34 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Oregon | L 35-54 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Washington State | L 32-37 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs UCLA | W 23-20 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTSA | W 32-28 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 1 | 45 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Texas Tech | W 68-55 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona State | 32 | 38 | 5.3 | 32 |
| 2014 Postseason | Arizona State | 127 | 57.5 | 10.4 | 95 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona State | 127 | 57.5 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 44 | 70 | 4 | -83 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 334 | 64.2 | 12.4 | 290 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17
Primary metric
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#4
UCLA
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
334 primary output · 64.2 efficiency · 12.4 usage
56.8
#2
2014 Postseason · Arizona State
41.5
127 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Arizona State
41.5
127 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 10.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
537
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.