Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2012-2013Oklahoma State
Blake Jackson
WR • 6'3" • Gilbert, AZ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Blake Jackson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.1
Consistency
31.5
Season Value
31.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oklahoma State
121213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Jackson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Blake Jackson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 598 primary output with 95.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
32.7
Efficiency
71.1
Usage
7.4
Consistency
31.5
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 9. UTSA: 73. Unknown: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 1 by 60. UTSA: 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins41 · n=2
First Half41 · n=2
All Games32.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 598 | 95.1 | 11.2 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 598 | 95.1 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 98 | 71.1 | 7.4 | -500 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
TCU
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Oklahoma State
598 primary output · 95.1 efficiency · 11.2 usage
65.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
65.1
598 primary · 95.1 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
31.8
98 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 7.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
696
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.