Usage Score
28.9
Player Dossier
2010-2013Ohio State
WR • 6'0" • Monroeville, PA, USA
Corey Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28.9
Efficiency
68.6
Consistency
61.3
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Ohio State. Corey Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 669 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
55.1
Efficiency
68.6
Usage
28.9
Consistency
61.3
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 116. Buffalo: 25. San Diego State: 73. California: 35. Unknown: 36. Wisconsin: 85. Northwestern: 127. Iowa: 72. Penn State: 67. Purdue: 27. Illinois: 49. Indiana: 0. Michigan: 6. Michigan State: 53
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 8 by 96.7. Buffalo: 2 by 83.3. San Diego State: 6 by 81.1. California: 5 by 46.7. Unknown: 3 by 80. Wisconsin: 8 by 70.8. Northwestern: 6 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 100. Penn State: 4 by 100. Purdue: 4 by 45. Illinois: 7 by 46.7. Indiana: 1 by 0. Michigan: 1 by 40. Michigan State: 5 by 70.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | vs Clemson100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-40 | — | 8 | 116 | 14.6 | 14.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Michigan State | L 24-34 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Michigan | W 42-41 | — | 1 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Indiana | W 42-14 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Illinois | W 60-35 | — | 7 | 49 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Purdue | W 56-0 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Penn State | W 63-14 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Iowa | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 58 |
| Sun 10/6 | @ Northwestern100 receiving yards | W 40-30 | — | 6 | 127 | 21.2 | 21.20 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 9/29 | vs WisconsinHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 31-24 | — | 8 | 85 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ California | W 52-34 | — | 5 | 35 | 7.1 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs San Diego State2+ TD | W 42-7 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Buffalo | W 40-20 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio State | 669 | 76.7 | 39.2 | 669 |
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio State | 771 | 68.6 | 28.9 | 102 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio State | 771 | 68.6 | 28.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Clemson
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 79.2 efficiency score.
#4
Illinois
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 82.9 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Ohio State
669 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 39.2 usage
67.7
#2
2013 Postseason · Ohio State
64.7
771 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 28.9 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Ohio State
64.7
771 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 28.9 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9477
Cardinal O'Hara · Springfield, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,440
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Corey Brown quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit