Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Player Dossier
2012-2016Rutgers
P • 6'2" • Melbourne, Australia
Tim Gleeson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
85
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Wyoming
Snapshot
Player Story
Tim Gleeson built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a punter from Melbourne wearing No. 99, spending time with Rutgers and Wyoming. The clearest part of Tim Gleeson's career was his field-position work: 94...
Read the storyTim Gleeson, P. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Wyoming. Tim Gleeson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wyoming | 12 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Tim Gleeson played P for Wyoming and Rutgers. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tim Gleeson recorded 1 rushing yards and -2 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Wyoming.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Wyoming paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wyoming, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 0. Howard: 0. Penn State: 0. Navy: 0. Tulane: 0. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 0. Nebraska: 0. Wisconsin: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
— vs Wisconsin
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/1 | vs Wisconsin | L 0-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Nebraska | L 24-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Ohio State | L 17-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Michigan | W 26-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Tulane | W 31-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Navy | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Penn State | L 10-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Howard | W 38-25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Washington State | W 41-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Player Story
Tim Gleeson built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a punter from Melbourne wearing No. 99, spending time with Rutgers and Wyoming. The clearest part of Tim Gleeson's career was his field-position work: 94 punts, 3,953 punting yards, and 11 punts inside the 20 across 21 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with Wyoming. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Special-teams careers depend on repeatable opportunity, not just one highlight. His career also includes 1 rushing yard, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 21 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Rutgers and Wyoming.
The arc is straightforward: Tim Gleeson moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wyoming
2012
Opening stop
Rutgers
2014-2016
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wyoming | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs San Diego State
Week 13 · L 28-42 · Conference game
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0
Touchdowns
0 takeover
0 primary-metric impact.
#2
@ UNLV
Week 12 · W 28-23 · Conference game
0
Touchdowns
0 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
@ New Mexico
Week 11 · W 28-23 · Conference game
0
Touchdowns
0 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
vs Colorado State
Week 10 · W 45-31 · Conference game
0
Touchdowns
0 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
vs Boise State
Week 9 · L 14-45 · Conference game
0
Touchdowns
0 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Wyoming
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2014 Regular Season · Rutgers
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.