Usage Score
6.8
Player Profile
Dane Evans
QB • 6'1" • Sanger, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Dane Evans is a balanced quarterback profile with 6.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57
Consistency
82.3
Season Value
57.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Tulsa
12131415151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Tulsa
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Tulsa
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Dane Evans, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Tulsa. Dane Evans is a balanced quarterback profile with 6.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Tulsa paired 4,323 primary output with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with 376 yards of offense and 69.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
255.3
Efficiency
57
Usage
6.8
Consistency
82.3
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 326. San José State: 179. Ohio State: 107. Unknown: 276. Fresno State: 264. SMU: 248. Houston: 357. Tulane: 230. Memphis: 243. East Carolina: 258. Navy: 376. UCF: 140. Cincinnati: 315
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 41 by 78.4. San José State: 28 by 56. Ohio State: 36 by 32.5. Unknown: 30 by 58.2. Fresno State: 40 by 56.9. SMU: 50 by 49. Houston: 53 by 51.2. Tulane: 26 by 61.6. Memphis: 35 by 66.2. East Carolina: 40 by 54.5. Navy: 29 by 69.9. UCF: 31 by 49.3. Cincinnati: 43 by 57.9
Split Comparison
Wins244.8 · n=9 · -35.2 vs Losses
Losses280 · n=3 · +35.2 vs Wins
First Half251 · n=7 · -9.3 vs Second Half
Second Half260.3 · n=6 · +9.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
78.4 vs Central Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/19 | vs Central Michigan300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 55-10 | 28 | 38 | 304 | 73.7 | 5 | 0 | 78.4 | 3 | 22 | 7.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Cincinnati300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 40-37 | 25 | 38 | 305 | 65.8 | 3 | 2 | 57.9 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCF | W 35-20 | 12 | 25 | 126 | 48.0 | 2 | 1 | 49.3 | 6 | 14 | 2.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Navy300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 40-42 | 16 | 27 | 369 | 59.3 | 4 | 1 | 69.9 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs East Carolina3+ TD | W 45-24 | 22 | 38 | 274 | 57.9 | 3 | 0 | 54.5 | 2 | -16 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Memphis | W 59-30 | 20 | 33 | 234 | 60.6 | 2 | 0 | 66.2 | 2 | 9 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tulane3+ TD | W 50-27 | 14 | 23 | 236 | 60.9 | 3 | 0 | 61.6 | 3 | -6 | -2 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Houston300-yard game | L 31-38 | 27 | 51 | 365 | 52.9 | 1 | 1 | 51.2 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs SMU | W 43-40 | 25 | 44 | 247 | 56.8 | 1 | 1 | 49 | 6 | 1 | 0.20 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Fresno State3+ TD | W 48-41 | 24 | 34 | 281 | 70.6 | 4 | 1 | 56.9 | 6 | -17 | -2.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 19 | 29 | 282 | 65.5 | 3 | 1 | 58.2 | 1 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 3-48 | 15 | 32 | 127 | 46.9 | 0 | 4 | 32.5 | 4 | -20 | -5 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs San José State | W 45-10 | 12 | 23 | 198 | 52.2 | 1 | 0 | 56 | 5 | -19 | -3.80 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 950 | 49 | 7.7 | 950 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 3,160 | 53.3 | 16.9 | 2,210 |
| 2015 Postseason | Tulsa | 4,323 | 58.8 | 16.7 | 1,163 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 4,323 | 58.8 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 3,319 | 57 | 6.8 | -1,004 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 3,319 | 57 | 6.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with 411 yards of offense and 63.3 efficiency.
411
Primary metric
411 total offense with 63.3 efficiency.
#2
Virginia Tech
392
Primary metric
Loss with 392 yards of offense and 61.8 efficiency.
392 total offense with 61.8 efficiency.
#3
Navy
376
Primary metric
Loss with 376 yards of offense and 69.9 efficiency.
376 total offense with 69.9 efficiency.
#4
Florida Atlantic
416
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
416 total offense with 59.8 efficiency.
#5
Central Michigan
326
Primary metric
Win with 326 yards of offense and 78.4 efficiency.
326 total offense with 78.4 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Tulsa
4,323 primary output · 58.8 efficiency · 16.7 usage
65.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Tulsa
65.1
4,323 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 16.7 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Tulsa
58.6
3,160 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 16.9 usage
Milestones
26
250+ passing yards
16
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
16
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
11,752
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.