Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2012-2016Texas A&M
Boone Niederhofer
WR • 6'3" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Boone Niederhofer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
45
Consistency
93.8
Season Value
39.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Boone Niederhofer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Boone Niederhofer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 293 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 45 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
13.5
Efficiency
45
Usage
8.3
Consistency
93.8
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 11. New Mexico State: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
All Games13.5 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs New Mexico State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 293 | 60.7 | 12.8 | 293 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7 | 23.4 | 4.6 | -286 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 27 | 45 | 8.3 | 20 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 81.1 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 57.5 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Alabama
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M
293 primary output · 60.7 efficiency · 12.8 usage
56.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
39.1
27 primary · 45 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
31.4
7 primary · 23.4 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
327
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.