Usage Score
18.3
Player Dossier
2012-2015Texas A&M
Brice Dolezal
RB • 5'9" • Austin, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Brice Dolezal leans balanced backfield option traits and 60.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
60.7
Consistency
76
Season Value
63.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
12131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brice Dolezal, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Brice Dolezal leans balanced backfield option traits and 60.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 204 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
3
Scrimmage Yards / G
68
Efficiency
60.7
Usage
18.3
Consistency
76
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 83. Nevada: 31. Unknown: 90
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 17 by 50.9. Nevada: 4 by 82.3. Unknown: 19 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Wins57 · n=2
First Half57 · n=2
All Games68 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
82.3 vs Nevada
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 70 | 42.1 | 6.3 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 79 | 36.6 | 7.1 | 9 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 104 | 64.2 | 12.3 | 25 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 204 | 60.7 | 18.3 | 100 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 86 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
86
Primary metric
86 scrimmage yards and 17.2 usage.
#2
Unknown
90
Primary metric
Game with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
90 scrimmage yards and 23.8 usage.
#3
UTEP
28
Primary metric
Win with 28 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
28 scrimmage yards and 10.2 usage.
#4
Ball State
83
Primary metric
Win with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 24.3 usage.
#5
Unknown
27
Primary metric
Game with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
27 scrimmage yards and 10.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
204 primary output · 60.7 efficiency · 18.3 usage
63.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M
47.1
104 primary · 64.2 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Texas A&M
39.8
70 primary · 42.1 efficiency · 6.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
457
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.