Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2012-2013Texas A&M
Derel Walker
WR • 6'2" • Hillsboro, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Derel Walker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
89.1
Consistency
73
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Derel Walker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas A&M. Derel Walker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 818 primary output with 89.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 89.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.9
Efficiency
89.1
Usage
15.6
Consistency
73
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 113. Rice: 6. Unknown: 57. Alabama: 66. SMU: 54. Arkansas: 81. Ole Miss: 72. Auburn: 19. Vanderbilt: 59. UTEP: 23. Mississippi State: 78. LSU: 130. Missouri: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 6 by 100. Rice: 1 by 40. Unknown: 4 by 95. Alabama: 5 by 88. SMU: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 7 by 77.1. Ole Miss: 5 by 96. Auburn: 2 by 63.3. Vanderbilt: 4 by 98.3. UTEP: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. LSU: 6 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins60.8 · n=8 · -8 vs Losses
Losses68.8 · n=4 · +8 vs Wins
First Half64.1 · n=7 · +2.6 vs Second Half
Second Half61.5 · n=6 · -2.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Duke100 receiving yards | W 52-48 | — | 6 | 113 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 1 | 44 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Missouri | L 21-28 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ LSU100 receiving yards | L 10-34 | — | 6 | 130 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Mississippi State | W 51-41 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs UTEP | W 57-7 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Vanderbilt2+ TD | W 56-24 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Auburn | L 41-45 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/13 | @ Ole Miss | W 41-38 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas | W 45-33 | — | 7 | 81 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs SMU | W 42-13 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Alabama | L 42-49 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Rice | W 52-31 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 85 | 68.7 | 6 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas A&M | 818 | 89.1 | 15.6 | 733 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 818 | 89.1 | 15.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Duke
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
Mississippi State
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
818 primary output · 89.1 efficiency · 15.6 usage
69.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M
69.4
818 primary · 89.1 efficiency · 15.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Texas A&M
37
85 primary · 68.7 efficiency · 6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
903
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.