Usage / Role
81%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2016SMU
QB • 6'0" • Houston, TX, USA
Matt Davis is a dual-threat creator with 30.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
81%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
65
Solid production for a quarterback
Reliability
71
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
66
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Player Story
Matt Davis built his college career from 2014 through 2016 as a quarterback from Houston, TX wearing No. 4, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Matt Davis' career was his passing role: 3,273 passing yards,...
Read the storyMatt Davis, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · SMU. Matt Davis is a dual-threat creator with 30.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 10 | 1,468 | 855 | 613 | 7 | 54.6 |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 12 | 3,024 | 2,263 | 761 | 26 | 80.4 |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | 246 | 155 | 91 | 2 | 60.5 |
Related Context
Matt Davis played QB for SMU. Across 3 tracked seasons, Matt Davis recorded 3,273 passing yards, 1,465 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
SMU paired 3,024 primary output with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
252
Efficiency
59.2
Usage
37.4
Consistency
79.2
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 281. North Texas: 296. TCU: 396. James Madison: 357. East Carolina: 232. Houston: 294. South Florida: 130. Tulsa: 243. Temple: 269. Navy: 154. Tulane: 321. Memphis: 51
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 47 by 60.7. North Texas: 41 by 75.9. TCU: 49 by 69.9. James Madison: 47 by 72.2. East Carolina: 50 by 51.9. Houston: 50 by 62.4. South Florida: 38 by 43.5. Tulsa: 48 by 49.2. Temple: 46 by 63.2. Navy: 33 by 48.1. Tulane: 40 by 81.4. Memphis: 34 by 31.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
81.4 vs Tulane
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | @ Memphis | L 0-63 | 4 | 18 | 28 | 22.2 | 0 | 1 | 31.8 | 16 | 23 | 1.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs TulaneDual-threat | W 49-21 | 17 | 24 | 165 | 70.8 | 0 | 0 | 81.4 | 16 | 156 | 9.80 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Navy | L 14-55 | 8 | 22 | 124 | 36.4 | 1 | 1 | 48.1 | 11 | 30 | 2.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs TempleDual-threat | L 40-60 | 17 | 29 | 167 | 58.6 | 1 | 1 | 63.2 | 17 | 102 | 6 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Tulsa3+ TD | L 31-40 | 19 | 39 | 236 | 48.7 | 3 | 1 | 49.2 | 9 | 7 | 0.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ South Florida | L 14-38 | 9 | 23 | 113 | 39.1 | 0 | 1 | 43.5 | 15 | 17 | 1.10 | 0 | 28 |
| Fri 10/9 | @ Houston3+ TD | L 28-49 | 21 | 35 | 248 | 60.0 | 3 | 0 | 62.4 | 15 | 46 | 3.10 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs East Carolina | L 23-49 | 19 | 37 | 249 | 51.4 | 2 | 0 | 51.9 | 13 | -17 | -1.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs James Madison3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 45-48 | 18 | 30 | 262 | 60.0 | 1 | 0 | 72.2 | 17 | 95 | 5.60 | 2 | 35 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ TCU300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 37-56 | 18 | 32 | 334 | 56.3 | 1 | 0 | 69.9 | 17 | 62 | 3.60 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs North Texas3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 31-13 | 17 | 24 | 171 | 70.8 | 2 | 0 | 75.9 | 17 | 125 | 7.40 | 2 | 50 |
| Fri 9/4 | vs BaylorDual-threat | L 21-56 | 16 | 23 | 166 | 69.6 | 2 | 2 | 60.7 | 24 | 115 | 4.80 | 0 | 24 |
Player Story
Matt Davis built his college career from 2014 through 2016 as a quarterback from Houston, TX wearing No. 4, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Matt Davis' career was his passing role: 3,273 passing yards, 21 touchdown passes, 517 attempts, and 1,465 rushing yards across 23 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2015 with SMU. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 1,465 rushing yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 23 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across SMU.
The arc is straightforward: Matt Davis moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 1,468 | 57.9 | 33.5 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 3,024 | 59.2 | 37.4 | 1,556 |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 246 | 66.1 | 30.4 | -2,778 |
#1 Featured game
@ Tulsa
Week 11 · L 28-38 · Conference game
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
393
Total Offense
88.4 takeover
393 total offense with 65.1 efficiency.
#2
@ TCU
Week 3 · L 37-56
396
Total Offense
83.4 takeover
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
396 total offense with 69.9 efficiency.
#3
@ UConn
Week 15 · W 27-20 · Conference game
336
Total Offense
83.2 takeover
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
336 total offense with 64.2 efficiency.
#4
vs James Madison
Week 4 · L 45-48
357
Total Offense
82.7 takeover
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
357 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#5
vs Tulane
Week 12 · W 49-21 · Conference game
321
Total Offense
81.7 takeover
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
321 total offense with 81.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · SMU
3,024 primary output · 59.2 efficiency · 37.4 usage
80.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · SMU
60.5
246 primary · 66.1 efficiency · 30.4 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · SMU
54.6
1,468 primary · 57.9 efficiency · 33.5 usage
2
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
6
3+ TD games
15
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.