Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2012-2016Tulsa
Matt Linscott
LB • 6'1" • Tulsa, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Matt Linscott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
38.7
Consistency
40.9
Season Value
27.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Tulsa
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Linscott, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Tulsa. Matt Linscott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 38.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
38.7
Usage
8.8
Consistency
40.9
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 0. San José State: 0. Ohio State: 0. Unknown: 2. Fresno State: 2. SMU: 1. Houston: 0. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 2. East Carolina: 4. Navy: 0. UCF: 4. Cincinnati: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. San José State: 5 by 20.8. Ohio State: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 8 by 53.3. Fresno State: 2 by 28.3. SMU: 12 by 60. Houston: 10 by 41.7. Tulane: 3 by 12.5. Memphis: 5 by 40.8. East Carolina: 6 by 65. Navy: 9 by 37.5. UCF: 6 by 65. Cincinnati: 4 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=9 · +1.7 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=3 · -1.7 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2 · n=6 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
65 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/19 | vs Central Michigan | W 55-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Cincinnati | W 40-37 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCFSplash game | W 35-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Navy | L 40-42 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | vs East Carolina2+ sacks · Splash game | W 45-24 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Memphis | W 59-30 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tulane | W 50-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Houston10+ tackles | L 31-38 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs SMU10+ tackles | W 43-40 | 12 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Fresno State | W 48-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 8 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 3-48 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs San José State | W 45-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 17 | 38.7 | 8.8 | 16 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 17 | 38.7 | 8.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#2
East Carolina
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.3 takeover score.
#3
UL Monroe
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.3 takeover score.
#5
Memphis
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 34.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Tulsa
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
27.6
17 primary · 38.7 efficiency · 8.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
27.6
17 primary · 38.7 efficiency · 8.8 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
3
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
80
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.